Supporters have been in two camps when it comes to Warburton. The discussion was particularly heated when we went on a ten match unbeaten run during November/December.
Some blamed the results solely on Warburton and wanted to get rid as soon as possible (some still do).
Others blamed in on a weak squad and lack of a proper striker.
I belong to the group that repeatedly said that our fortunte is likely to change if we just get a decent striker. The idea that you can sign prolific strikers on £6k a week simply does not fly.
After we signed Austin we have won three consequitive away matches against very decent opposition (Luton, Cardiff, Watford). We lost at home to Derby, a match that could have gone either way. 3-0-1 with a goal difference of 5-2 is pretty good to me and a good answer to the main question: Did we need a new manager or a new striker?
We need a longer period to really see how we and Warburton are doing with a more balanced squad, but the start is good.
By the way, when did we last win three away matches in a row?
Some blamed the results solely on Warburton and wanted to get rid as soon as possible (some still do).
Others blamed in on a weak squad and lack of a proper striker.
I belong to the group that repeatedly said that our fortunte is likely to change if we just get a decent striker. The idea that you can sign prolific strikers on £6k a week simply does not fly.
After we signed Austin we have won three consequitive away matches against very decent opposition (Luton, Cardiff, Watford). We lost at home to Derby, a match that could have gone either way. 3-0-1 with a goal difference of 5-2 is pretty good to me and a good answer to the main question: Did we need a new manager or a new striker?
We need a longer period to really see how we and Warburton are doing with a more balanced squad, but the start is good.
By the way, when did we last win three away matches in a row?
Comment