On the back of the Tony Pulis sacking announced today, I'm seeing posts saying no way do we want him here.
Pulis would drill the defence, he would never put up with them tippy tapping there way out of the penalty area.
He would demand the ball be loaded into the opposition goal area, and expect the forwards to be in there challenging and midfielders getting in the box for second balls.
He would want to see QPR playing in the other teams half and turning their defence.
He would win more games than MW has this season and probably keep us up.
So do we want pretty but ultimately pointless football or winning football?
Things are far from right at Wednesday but I think he would have kept them up, he improved them.
He is similar to Warnock in style and most would have him back.
Btw winning football is good football for me.
Pulis would drill the defence, he would never put up with them tippy tapping there way out of the penalty area.
He would demand the ball be loaded into the opposition goal area, and expect the forwards to be in there challenging and midfielders getting in the box for second balls.
He would want to see QPR playing in the other teams half and turning their defence.
He would win more games than MW has this season and probably keep us up.
So do we want pretty but ultimately pointless football or winning football?
Things are far from right at Wednesday but I think he would have kept them up, he improved them.
He is similar to Warnock in style and most would have him back.
Btw winning football is good football for me.
Comment