Would you take Hugill Back on loan?

[dogsrrs]

It's no good looking for more forwards we don't give a service to what we've got ! our m/f doesn't serve the forwards or cover the defenders so make what you will of that , me I don't see any leadership on any part of the pitch

[stanistheman]

Hugill was best for us when he had wells along side him - for dykes to be his most effective we need to play 2 up front - the Best Strikers in recent times have been in duo's Dykes and either Bonne or Kelman needs play every game and form a partnership. Letting Wells leave was the biggest mistake we have made in recent times - especially if we know we had the Eze money coming in - Dykes and Wells would have been fantastic in this division.

Agree with you about Wells. Some of us said the club should have found a way to get the funds in somehow. One way could have been a deal for Eze (probably less than the fee we received) , but we get to keep him on loan for the remainder of the season. Too late now of course.

As for Hugill back, yes but only if tactics were to change. He would be just as ineffective as a lone striker with practically zero service.

[Fozzieboy]

Rather give Kelman a run out