I think I'd take minimum of 9 mill + 10% sell on for Eze and 4 mill + 10% sell-on for BOS. I think the club will sell for @ 7 mill + 10% for Eze and 3 mill + 10% for BOS. We are skint. Beggars can't be choosers. Uncle Tone let Hughes and the equally useless Redknapp waste all his dosh.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is the minimum you would take for Eze & BOS?
Collapse
X
-
In end it won’t matter. We haven’t tied them down to long contacts to begin with like Brentford do
And QPR sell their best assets for pennys. Charlie Austin, 18 PL goals and prolific 4 million
Freeman, top assists in the league 5 million
Qpr are ran like ####Under Les Ferdinand:
Luke Freeman, top assists in the league: 4million
Alex Smithies, great goalie for this club: 3,5million
Charlie Austin, 19 Premier League goals: 4million
Jack Robinson: Contract ran out, left for free
And many more mistakes
LES FERDINAND, IT'S TIME TO GO
Comment
-
Originally posted by qpr View PostIn end it won’t matter. We haven’t tied them down to long contacts to begin with like Brentford do
And QPR sell their best assets for pennys. Charlie Austin, 18 PL goals and prolific 4 million
Freeman, top assists in the league 5 million
Qpr are ran like ####
Comment
-
Can we get over the Austin deal? We rejected a £15m offer from Leicester because we believed that keeping him would get us back to the premiership and earn us £100m. When that promotion was unlikely we took £4m with only six months left on his contract. That lose of £11m was a strategic / investment decision to get us back up. It was a good deal and he could have walked for nothing in another six months. The management were aware of the implications of not accepting that Leicester offer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SheepRanger View PostCan we get over the Austin deal? We rejected a £15m offer from Leicester because we believed that keeping him would get us back to the premiership and earn us £100m. When that promotion was unlikely we took £4m with only six months left on his contract. That lose of £11m was a strategic / investment decision to get us back up. It was a good deal and he could have walked for nothing in another six months. The management were aware of the implications of not accepting that Leicester offer.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stainrod View Post
I’m afraid some people just don’t want to hear it . Some fans think we can make our best players sign 4 year deals on low wages .Some fans think we accept low fees because we want to not because we were trying to avoid ffp breaches .It doesn’t matter what we sell some of these players for it will never be enough .
Comment
-
We got a right result getting £4 mil for Charlie - Has he actually played more than 12 games since?????? Anyway, back to the thread at hand...... Forestieri is out of contract and leaving Wednesday and there is some conjecture that he'd make a decent replacement for Eze. Maybe the ducks are starting to line up?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stainrod View Post
I’m afraid some people just don’t want to hear it . Some fans think we can make our best players sign 4 year deals on low wages .Some fans think we accept low fees because we want to not because we were trying to avoid ffp breaches .It doesn’t matter what we sell some of these players for it will never be enough .
Comment
-
Let's face it, what exactly have Eze and BOS done this year to warrant a fat fee? Neither of them have kicked-on this season, personally I think they've gone missing more often than not. I accept it must be hard to look good when you're surrounded by plodders but I can't see how any interested parties would be inclined to invest heavily in either of them on current form.
Comment
Comment