Originally posted by dogsrrs
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why, oh why, are we playing with almost no width?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by WeAreQPR12 View PostI know you slated Ollie but its good to see you asking similar questions about our current manager that gets treated miles better by some on here even though he don't play wingers either. Good coach yet terrible with regards to tactics.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shania View PostI wonder why a professional fotball tactician will deem a 4-4-2 set up less effective than a other more modern(?) one, like 3-5-2 or whatever?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stanley View Post
Because 3-5-2 requires wingbacks - a highly specialised position - which most clubs, particularly outside the PL, simply do not possess in their squads.QPR
Best team in the world
Sort of
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shania View PostI would be very happy if one of the mods could edit the thread title. Two errors in it.. Thanks in advance..
Originally posted by Shania View PostBut with a squad which has got wingers in it, why don`t use them?
Comment
-
Theres absolutely nothing wrong with 4 4 2 it's just a case of having the right players at the right time , that formation wasn't widely used before 1966 , in fact 3 at the back is the oldest football formation with the W M formation , the 3 at the back was RB...?CH ...LB .....THE MF ...RH....LH....ISIDE RIGHT ....INSIIDE LEFT ....O/S R...C/F ...OS L FULL BACKS PURELY DEFENCIVE ,THE H/BS holding mid s one inside forward plays centre mid the other plays along side the C/f , the wingers or outside right and left played down the flanks
more less wing backs
Yes iknow I might not have made this plain enough but just draw a W on top of a M each point being a position I'm to much of a technophobe to draw things on my phone
Scrub my attempt to explain as ###### , just Google footballs w, m formationLast edited by dogsrrs; 02-09-2018, 04:31 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dogsrrs View Post
Sheep's I hope you don't think Stoke has been anything other than an anti football derge of a club in recent years ???
Comment
-
Originally posted by SheepRanger View Post
Like many teams that Pulis has left behind most are now in a worse position from a League perspective. There were many fans calling for this head,.Stoke & WBA, but I wonder whether they regretting that after. I have no view on the style of play but it was nothing short of effective.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I think he's playing the right way with the strikers hemed and wells. Don't need wingers just need the quality on ball and Freeman and eze are the best we have to pick passes to them there are intelligent players.as someone said more compact is also key.if sylla and Smith played I'd then play wingers
Comment
-
Originally posted by pauly View PostI think he's playing the right way with the strikers hemed and wells. Don't need wingers just need the quality on ball and Freeman and eze are the best we have to pick passes to them there are intelligent players.as someone said more compact is also key.if sylla and Smith played I'd then play wingers
QPR
Best team in the world
Sort of
Comment
-
Originally posted by West Acton View Post
Begs question if we have no intention of playing with wingers why the hell do we keep recruiting them
I think the board brought McClaren in cause they think he can turn Eze into a player and fetch a big fee. Maybe Steve will even get a cut?
Scratching my head trying to work out the reason behind his appointment and best I can come up with. Ollie didn't rate Eze that highly apparently.
Comment
Comment