Originally posted by nasser95
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
On my way home
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Joe90 View Post
Okay, sounds like your more tactically astute than me! What I've noticed is Bidwell ends up out wide linking up with Freeman and struggles to get around players, pass and cross. I'm assuming he's being used as a wingback which he doesn't seem suited to. Do we not have any proper wingers who can do that?
What we should have is a proper left sided winger playing as a pure winger so Bidwell can stay deeper or at least he can drop back to cover when Bidwell overlaps. The other side can then be more of a narrow side. If your full back is slow, you really need a pacy winger able to play the same side and we don't at the moment."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by nasser95 View Post
Why play with two strikers who aren't getting service? All we're doing is limiting service further and having 2 players do Sweet FA. Much rather see us just play with a legitimate winger on one side of a 433..
4-3-3 would be an improvement as you suggest, but on that basis so would 4-4-2 (although 4-4-2 diamond would take us back to a lack of width).
Lack of width where it really does damage is a big problem for us since it prevents from utilising a proven asset.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hal9thou View Post
4-2-3-1 is SMac's favoured formation. It presents two major problems for us. Smith's ratio - as you will be well aware - is remarkably good for someone who both here and at Fulham did not get the service required, ie from deep and wide. The minute he gets a) an authenitic winger and b) someone to pick up the pieces alongside him, there will be goals on the menu. So problem one with 4-2-3-1 is a lack of width. Problem two is that we simply don't have a quality back to goal striker who can play one up.
4-3-3 would be an improvement as you suggest, but on that basis so would 4-4-2 (although 4-4-2 diamond would take us back to a lack of width).
Lack of width where it really does damage is a big problem for us since it prevents from utilising a proven asset.
Comment
Comment