I know its boring, but
When we carried a vote 86% of board members wanted to stick by Paulo Sousa, how can this board be labelled in being instrumental in his removal, when only 14% were for him leaving?
Its been advocated by supporters elsewhere that this board is a Pro QPR board when in reality it allows everyone a voice.
heard more than once that WATRB;s cronies are responsible !!!
When we carried a vote 86% of board members wanted to stick by Paulo Sousa, how can this board be labelled in being instrumental in his removal, when only 14% were for him leaving?
Its been advocated by supporters elsewhere that this board is a Pro QPR board when in reality it allows everyone a voice.
heard more than once that WATRB;s cronies are responsible !!!