To get him back (and add Osbourne) we would have to shed (at least) 2 other loanees. So yes I'd have him back and perm 2 from Ikeme, Hill, Bent, Priskin for a speedy return home. Now THAT would be positive.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would you Have Ben Watson Back??
Collapse
X
-
Will he be played in his correct position?
Will he be played alongside another midfielder who knows what his role is and actually keeps to it?
Ben Watson before this season was one of the best central midfielders in this division hence why a Premiership club bought him. Played in his correct position he is better than any other midfielder at the club. His performances against Barnsley and Newcastle showed that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by qblockpete View PostI think Quashie has disappointed, be surprised to see him play next few games to be honest.
Him and Hogan took the brunt of the Harford force at half-time
Imagine reading that on here if you was a player?
By the way, im not suggesting Paladini told you, as i'm not stupid enough to believe he is your only contact at the club
Comment
-
Although I would love Watson back, he is a good player, just because he did not do it in the short period he was here, that does not change. Apart from that, this is no way to run a football team transfer policy. It clearly demonstrates a need for a team manager making the calls. Not from a poll conducted amongst the supporters on a messageboard.
Comment
-
I was thinking about Watson on Tuesday whilst watching Quashie in his place against Ipswich and thinking he wasn't so bad afterall.
I often said QPR should extend his loan and was disappointed when he returned to Wigan. Whilst he was playing, apart from a few games here and there, QPR were not as bad as they have been since January.
He is clearly wasting his career at Wigan and should be looking to return to QPR or some other team, to kick start it again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sirpiechucker View PostWill he be played in his correct position?
Will he be played alongside another midfielder who knows what his role is and actually keeps to it?
Ben Watson before this season was one of the best central midfielders in this division hence why a Premiership club bought him. Played in his correct position he is better than any other midfielder at the club. His performances against Barnsley and Newcastle showed that.
I agree, but what is his correct position. Would you play him alongside Faurlin or Buzsaky in midfield, neither or both?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bluehoop View PostTo get him back (and add Osbourne) we would have to shed (at least) 2 other loanees. So yes I'd have him back and perm 2 from Ikeme, Hill, Bent, Priskin for a speedy return home. Now THAT would be positive.
Borrowdale is better than Hill and if QPR sign Voltz, Connolly could always be used as a LB with Stewart in the centre if needed.
So Hill and Bent are the two most obvious choices to send back.
Ikeme can also go if Cerny is fit, I'd have Putnins on the bench.
So there is the answer to bringing in Watson and Osbourne.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stanistheman View PostUnless against the rules of loans ban it, it should be no problem in deciding who to send back really, Hill, Ikeme look crap and Bent is injured.
Borrowdale is better than Hill and if QPR sign Voltz, Connolly could always be used as a LB with Stewart in the centre if needed.
So Hill and Bent are the two most obvious choices to send back.
Ikeme can also go if Cerny is fit, I'd have Putnins on the bench.
So there is the answer to bringing in Watson and Osbourne.#standuptocancer
#inyourfacecancer
Comment
-
Originally posted by qblockpete View PostI think Quashie has disappointed, be surprised to see him play next few games to be honest.
Him and Hogan took the brunt of the Harford force at half-time
Comment
Comment