Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Regarding consortium

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Undecided
    Silver Seat
    • Sep 2017
    • 2077

    #91
    Originally posted by cross it Dave
    Maybe sone wise sage could help me out here, as it has been puzzling me for sometime, as I don’t know the ins and outs of FFP.

    If the current or any new owners invested heavily into the club via shirt sponsorship or naming rights of the stadium etc etc, what would that do to our FFP status regarding spending wisely on new players.
    The amount invested by the owners needs to be a reasonable "market" rate. So stumping up "zillions" wouldn't wash.

    Comment

    • cross it Dave
      Silver Seat
      • Sep 2009
      • 3795

      #92
      Originally posted by Undecided

      The amount invested by the owners needs to be a reasonable "market" rate. So stumping up "zillions" wouldn't wash.
      So what is a reasonable market rate in our position?
      I have supported Rangers for 55 seasons, since March 1969.

      Comment

      • qprjeff1882
        Silver Seat
        • Aug 2009
        • 4080

        #93
        Originally posted by cross it Dave

        So what is a reasonable market rate in our position?
        About a tenner
        ​​​​

        Comment

        • cross it Dave
          Silver Seat
          • Sep 2009
          • 3795

          #94
          Originally posted by qprjeff1882

          About a tenner
          ​​​​
          as much as that

          I have supported Rangers for 55 seasons, since March 1969.

          Comment

          • QPRDave
            The number 10
            • Mar 2009
            • 32072

            #95
            Originally posted by Undecided

            The amount invested by the owners needs to be a reasonable "market" rate. So stumping up "zillions" wouldn't wash.
            Didn't Man City do just that?.....chucked in "zillions" for naming rights/sponsorship?

            Comment

            • Undecided
              Silver Seat
              • Sep 2017
              • 2077

              #96
              Originally posted by QPRDave

              Didn't Man City do just that?.....chucked in "zillions" for naming rights/sponsorship?
              Reasonable market rate if you're Man C. Outrageous if you're a struggling hand to mouth Championship club .... apparently.

              Comment

              • SpongeParr
                Silver Seat
                • Sep 2015
                • 1003

                #97
                Sports Direct pay Newcastle £0 for their naming rights. It has added 300 million to SD worth apparently, but Ashley doesn't want to pay anything out for it.

                Comment

                • Rebel R's
                  King of Pessimism
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 12266

                  #98
                  I wish somebody would tell Les about the consortium because he is saying players will need to be sold this summer.,or is he just keeping the secret well ?


                  ​​​​

                  Comment

                  • QPRDave
                    The number 10
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 32072

                    #99
                    somebody's had it on their toes with our consortium money!!

                    Comment

                    • qprjeff1882
                      Silver Seat
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 4080

                      #100
                      Yeah, some Villa fans to pay their tax bill with it.

                      Comment

                      • hal9thou
                        Silver Seat
                        • May 2012
                        • 4258

                        #101
                        Originally posted by qprmarc
                        For those doubting this , you are so naive.
                        Not sure the doubters are looking quite so naive now Marc.

                        Any major investment resulting in board changes would have to be made public, never mind a change of ownership. Therefore not much point in prolonged secrecy if those were kind of changes you had in mind.

                        Of course it is possible that investors are being courted, and different avenues explored - but that happens anyway in this day and age.

                        The thing that really interests me is who exactly we are appealing to now re FFP. I've asked a few people and no one has a clue, might ring up the press office
                        wearing my other hat and ask if anyone is prepared to make a statement. Alternative would be to call the EFL. Does anyone on here know? Was rumoured to be the CAS (Switzerland) but it isn't listed for hearing.

                        Last edited by hal9thou; 07-06-2018, 07:06 PM.

                        Comment

                        • corbray
                          Silver Seat
                          • Feb 2016
                          • 3030

                          #102
                          Originally posted by Rebel R's
                          I wish somebody would tell Les about the consortium because he is saying players will need to be sold this summer.,or is he just keeping the secret well ?


                          ​​​​
                          tbh i don't mind the whole pleading poverty thing even if we do have money to spend. if we came outright and said that we have money avaliable we'd end up paying over the top for players. our current transfer policy has actually been pretty sound so far anyway so i have faith we'll do good business

                          Comment

                          • Rebel R's
                            King of Pessimism
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 12266

                            #103
                            Originally posted by corbray

                            tbh i don't mind the whole pleading poverty thing even if we do have money to spend. if we came outright and said that we have money avaliable we'd end up paying over the top for players. our current transfer policy has actually been pretty sound so far anyway so i have faith we'll do good business
                            I agree, the whole "consortium " thing is pure nonsense, I think we will bring in free out of contract players and non league players with future potential but I do fear we will lose at least one of our best players to keep our extremely limited finances in tact.

                            Comment

                            • Tarbie
                              Gold Seat
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 8542

                              #104
                              Originally posted by corbray

                              tbh i don't mind the whole pleading poverty thing even if we do have money to spend. if we came outright and said that we have money avaliable we'd end up paying over the top for players. our current transfer policy has actually been pretty sound so far anyway so i have faith we'll do good business
                              Totally agree.

                              It's a very good thing that no financial information is made public these days. We paid a heavy price for the whole "we've got more cash than you" days. We were a football agents wet dream for 2 or 3 seasons, and the legacy of those years will stay with us for a very long time.

                              As for the whole consortium rumour. Just a case of putting 2 and 2 together, but getting totally wrong, ain't it? The rumour was McLaren had backers looking to buy a club, but that could have been paper talk. I never heard anything but a few message board rumours about there being new investment in QPR. Whilst I thought it could have been plausible, it's entirely likely it was all just hot air!

                              Comment

                              • hal9thou
                                Silver Seat
                                • May 2012
                                • 4258

                                #105
                                Does anyone on here know?
                                Jabba the Hutt? Slartibartfast?

                                We don't, do we?


                                Comment

                                Working...