Another season of transition?

[QPRDave]

The season to come is one of the most exciting i can recall for a long time. We've got these young lions who must play a
prominent role at the club, is just piquing my interest for next season.
At the same time with so many of "our own" in the team i'm inclined to give them more leeway,
and expectation is not as high.

[Ginger Ninja]

I think McLaren bring manager and part of consortium would be and dreadful idea. Kind of becomes the unsackable manager and could be very very messy

But the fact that the Dortmund II manager has turned us down points to McLaren not being our manager doesn't it?
Means we are looking at other candidates.

[West Acton]

Never knew we had been turned by anyone where is that news from

[Ginger Ninja]

Never knew we had been turned by anyone where is that news from

Saw it on another thread mate.

[SheepRanger]

But the fact that the Dortmund II manager has turned us down points to McLaren not being our manager doesn't it?
Means we are looking at other candidates.

Iain Dowie?

[Kit]

I am really starting to think this is a consortium headed by SM buying shares in the club rather than him just being Manager. I still cant believe they would have sacked Olly, without someone ready to step in, wouldn't make sense at all.

[1973 ranger]

Fernandes did point out that there was more to just changing Holloway and any new potential owners or major investors would almost certainly want their own man in place.

[Alanwycombe]

All the talk and debate about transition or consolidation just complicates a very simple fact - play the game to win. If you do you get success, if you don't you get relegated. You can't plan to finish 10th. Attract the best you can afford and see where it gets you. Impossible to say buy X Y or Z and we will go up or down. The comments on here about our youngsters make them sound like the class of 92 when the truth is we still need to see how good they are if they constitute the majority of our team.

[Glevum_Hoop]

All the talk and debate about transition or consolidation just complicates a very simple fact - play the game to win. If you do you get success, if you don't you get relegated. You can't plan to finish 10th. Attract the best you can afford and see where it gets you. Impossible to say buy X Y or Z and we will go up or down. The comments on here about our youngsters make them sound like the class of 92 when the truth is we still need to see how good they are if they constitute the majority of our team.

Far to level headed post for this site Alan

[Ginger Ninja]

All the talk and debate about transition or consolidation just complicates a very simple fact - play the game to win. If you do you get success, if you don't you get relegated. You can't plan to finish 10th. Attract the best you can afford and see where it gets you. Impossible to say buy X Y or Z and we will go up or down. The comments on here about our youngsters make them sound like the class of 92 when the truth is we still need to see how good they are if they constitute the majority of our team.

This is a great post mate, but to be fair I don't think anyone has said our youngsters are anything like the class of 92. It's just it's been years since we had this many youngsters come through our ranks, all of which have bundles of potential and look like they can go on and become very good players. It's only natural to get excited for the future in this case.