this site and Paolo Sousa

[qprdad]

What was the reason given for his dismissal Dad ?

"It came to the club's attention that Mr De Sousa had, without authority, divulged highly confidential and sensitive information. The club, with legal advice, responded in this way to protect its position."

If you can find "Wozza" (Shergar will be easier) perhaps you could ask him/her......

Do you honestly believe that!...... PS dead cheesed off to find that FB medalling in team affairs, FB dead cheesed off the PS won't do as he is told.

Result.... use 'Blackstockgate' to get rid.... and that's the knub of it.

Any businessman with a troublesome employee will use a situation presented to him to remove someone he doesn't want any more!.... But, it's not the 'power' of this MB

[Sharpy]

Of course i believe that.It was put up on the offical site as the reason for his dismisal.Maybe you know something we don`t,perhaps you could inform Paulos legal team.

[IsleworthRanger]

Just to rewind a few months...

a few people on here were involved in hounding Paolo Sousa out of our club.

Just a question..where would we be now if he was still in charge??

I still laugh when I see statements like this as the vast majority on here actually wanted to give Sousa more time including myself despite the dire football and I still believe the way he was dismissed was murky to say the least.

[enzian]

Ow give it a rest will you?

PS was sacked because FB didn't want him there any more..... no other reason..... Do you really think that this MB had anything to do with it?:very_sad:

i believe it was because gp didn't want him there.felt his position was in danger.

[qblockpete]

Thats the perception, of course. That answers why so many liked Sousa.

Anyway, keep answring questions over someone who has left is a bit silly.

He was a point off play offs very early on, and fluffed it.

[theblackmafia.]

Thats the perception, of course. That answers why so many liked Sousa.

Anyway, keep answring questions over someone who has left is a bit silly.

He was a point off play offs very early on, and fluffed it.

....but we are so much better without him aren't we!? I mean, we score loads (11 in 10 games excluding FA Cup) and we conceed very few (25 in 10 games), so yes, well worth getting rid.

I think your responses on PS show your evident lack of football knowledge.

[qprdad]

Of course i believe that.It was put up on the offical site as the reason for his dismisal.Maybe you know something we don`t,perhaps you could inform Paulos legal team.

Sorry mate, not having a pop at all....... it's just obvious to me that PS didn't fit in with the orange donut's plans to interfere, and was removed.

Also, I'm bound to say that PS was trying to impose his view of how to play footy, without any regard for the quality or abilities of the squad. Give any hoofball manager Manchester United or Sc um etc, and they'll stop playing hoofball! i.e. you've got to play a system that suits the players - and I never felt he did..... ok, we didn't leak goals.... but we couldn't score... not that difficult to achieve for anyone... but I remember a certain game towards the end of his reign when we didin't muster one shot at goal at all, and the opposition team weren't fielding a recognised goalie!

Also, what about his constant tinkering.... always changing a winning squad - stuffing the confidence of strikers etc............. don't agree with the way he was axed / don't agree with alot of what the Donut FB's done, but PS was not a manager that I'd still want at the club!......... AND he definately wasn't sacked because of this MB was he?