I'll ask the question here

[superckat]

As this is where it seems most agrees with the Sousa decision

What exactly is being protected. Especially when the accusation is denied.

"Paulo's contract was terminated, after he - without authority - divulged highly confidential and sensitive information. The club with legal advice, responded in this way to protect it's position."

Once again Sousa denied it. So what position are they protecting and why?

[ScottJones]

Money I would have thought?

Sack him and he gets a pay off - probably circa half a million

Schwarzenegger him and he gets jack diddly.

Just at a guess.

[Bluehoop]

Probably protecting it's position in respect of any subsequent tort - legal dispute surrounding the termination of a contract for reasons other than non-performance.

[IsleworthRanger]

As this is where it seems most agrees with the Sousa decision

What exactly is being protected. Especially when the accusation is denied.

"Paulo's contract was terminated, after he - without authority - divulged highly confidential and sensitive information. The club with legal advice, responded in this way to protect it's position."

Once again Sousa denied it. So what position are they protecting and why?

You just cannot grasp it can you so lets make it nice and simple

90% of this sites posters did not want Sousa sacked or contract terminated or however the club dress it up and yet still posters from other sites persist that we all agreed to a man on here to get rid of him.

Now why would that be and whats the agenda here?

[superckat]

Isleworth calm down a bit, I think it's you that doesn't grasp it. So I'll try and make it even simpler for you.

1. I never said there was an agenda here
2. I never said everyone agreed to get rid of him. I know what the poll vote was?
3. When I said this is where most agrees with the Sousa decision. I meant that in all the various sites I visit. Most of the people who agree with the decision post on here.

Ok now?

[ScottJones]

Isleworth calm down a bit, I think it's you that doesn't grasp it. So I'll try and make it even simpler for you.

1. I never said there was an agenda here
2. I never said everyone agreed to get rid of him. I know what the poll vote was?
3. When I said this is where most agrees with the Sousa decision. I meant that in all the various sites I visit. Most of the people who agree with the decision post on here.

Ok now?

Fair enough mate :chill:

[HammersmithR]

I think why so many fans were peeved off about Sousa leaving was because, although the football was not great there was certainly not support to go and buy him the strikers that would have made his team.

However, most importantly as Flavio as said it was because he leaked highly confidential information which can only be about Helgusson failing a medical allegedly and talking about players' wages.

I did actually ask Helgusson on Mon if he passed a medical and he wouldn't confirm or deny. Well trained obviously!

But what I think has ****ed a lot fans off is that Sousa discussed allegedly what Lopez was earning and other club employees have done this on a regular basis. It was as if there are different rules for different employees.

Can we all see that?

They just wanted an excuse to get rid of him without paying him off like they've had to do with Dowie.

[IsleworthRanger]

Isleworth calm down a bit, I think it's you that doesn't grasp it. So I'll try and make it even simpler for you.

1. I never said there was an agenda here
2. I never said everyone agreed to get rid of him. I know what the poll vote was?
3. When I said this is where most agrees with the Sousa decision. I meant that in all the various sites I visit. Most of the people who agree with the decision post on here.

Ok now?

Seems to me that you are totally contradicting yourself

You state that you know the result of the poll on here and yet still insist that the vast majority of fans who are QPR messageboard users just happen to post on this site!!!

Still never mind and each to their interpretation of facts and figures and what does it matter in the end what any of us think.

[superckat]

Ok 1 more time. Of all the people I have read that agrees with the decision to terminate Sousa's contract. Most of them post on here.. Not the majority of the posters on here agree. But the majority who agrees, post on here. There is a difference.

Krill has previously told me that death threats aren't allowed. However I'm thinking of slashing my wrists with a butter knife about now.

[Bluehoop]

Ok 1 more time. Of all the people I have read that agrees with the decision to terminate Sousa's contract. Most of them post on here.. Not the majority of the posters on here agree. But the majority who agrees, post on here. There is a difference.

Krill has previously told me that death threats aren't allowed. However I'm thinking of slashing my wrists with a butter knife about now.

I'm a more regular viewer/poster on 606 than here and the views over there are about as equally split as they are on here. The main difference over there is people don't rack up thousands of posts spouting on about hidden agendas and arguing which board is better or whose banned from which.

[ScottJones]

I'm a more regular viewer/poster on 606 than here and the views over there are about as equally split as they are on here. The main difference over there is people don't rack up thousands of posts spouting on about hidden agendas and arguing which board is better or whose banned from which.

606 doesnt have games or a casino though

[Kirill]

Krill has previously told me that death threats aren't allowed. However I'm thinking of slashing my wrists with a butter knife about now.

I do not know how to deal with a death threat to self situation.
I fear that banning you will only push you closer to the edge

[Bluehoop]

606 doesnt have games or a casino though

Nor does it have BOTD
I didn't say it was better, just different.
I do like it here but don't do office politics and seek the sanctuary of the thoroughly pc BBC when it all goes pips up here

[ScottJones]

Nor does it have BOTD
I didn't say it was better, just different.
I do like it here but don't do office politics and seek the sanctuary of the thoroughly pc BBC when it all goes pips up here

Theres a lot of nutters on 606 And besides, Dave Mc, gets all his stories from here anyway - so i'd be reading yesterdays news

[Bluehoop]

Theres a lot of nutters on 606 And besides, Dave Mc, gets all his stories from here anyway - so i'd be reading yesterdays news

Trust me Scott - David has been lambasted several times recently for some really poor and lazy journalism - no I'm not referring to stuff he picks up over here either. As for the nutters, most of them are just trolls from other mb's having a pry :anger: