If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Bit of a giveaway by the 30 top scores listed against his name..... just a guess. As the poster you quote has a similar number, i would imagine it's a bit of a running comp / banter....
Nothing to get bothered about i'm sure.
hi.thanks for that.seems a reasonable explantion.without wanting to appear paranoid,which caused me to ask the question in the first place.recently i've had several posts and one thread removed.not just removed.deleted.queried admin.met with obfuscation.by the way they're still getting back to me.
So how many strikers we getting in? We are apparently getting rid or agymang pellicori and loaned helgusson to watford? So if we get 1 striker in thats s~*t.
Also we already have Ikeme, Taarabt, Simpson and now Hill on loan. So assuming these players will more than likely be playing in the same team at one point we only have one loan signing left. So if we sign more than one player from now it will have to be a perm :waaaht:
Yeh but all the players currently on loan i would expect to be first team players, so that would mean other signings (we have one loan left) if on loan would not be considered starting 11 and if thats the case little point signing them in the first place?
i wonder,by "eventful"did you mean we would sell our best player,hall would go and nobody in?(and you did say last week),have to say it hasnt really rekindled any "positivity" with me:shocked:
That statement sums this whole sorry episode in QPR history up ! No patience, as I have said so many times previously, the owners should be given time to sort out the mess they have created. They had a 4 year plan, so what if it takes 6 years surely better than the other alternative.
Comment