Tweet
I have asked this question a few times now with no response.
Can someone please tell me who's decision it was to bring in Paul Hart?
Now I know it's Flavio he gives the final nod, but surely it wasn't Flavio he said 'Go get me Paul Hart'. Surely Flavio was advised on this decision, I don't believe it was Flavio who identified Paul Hart as the man he wanted to manage us to the end of the season.
Listening to Talksport on Friday it was suggested it was Paladini who felt that Hart demonstrated no passion in training and he informed the players he was getting sacked. Then apparently Paladini ran to Falvio and told him he needed to be sack Hart.
I found this quote from an article in The Guardian
Briatore co-owns QPR with Bernie Ecclestone and Lakshmi Mittal and it is the Italian who takes the major decisions, assisted by Gianni Paladini, the club Chairman and Director of Football, according to one former coach. The coach, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said: “Paladini has a big say in the day-to-day running as Briatore is always in and out of the country. The owners there do love football but possibly they can get too involved and don’t leave it to the Manager and the staff. But what’s happening there now with all the Managers is making QPR laughable.”
Now taking this consideration and the pressures Falvio was under with his F1 Court Case at the time of Harts appointment would it be unwise to assume that it was infact Paladini who brought him in.
Then finally we come to Peterangers revelation on another site at the start of the transfer window about a fall out with Hart and the Board over our transfer policy. This was dismissed by some but then Nodge later revealed that Hart had sorted 2 good deals for Ashdown & Smith only to be told it was not within his remit by Paladini to sort out transfers. (I'm sure there was another quote about this in the press as well).
The press are fingering Flavio with the blame and that is understandable given he is the man at the top. However, it would appear Paladini is getting off lightly yet again and especially in media circles.
Did Paladini not get the yes man he was expecting in Hart? A bit like Sousa who was harder to remove so a smear campaign had to be instigated to get rid of him of him instead.
I just want an answer to my original question from someone who knows and I'll work the rest out for myself.
Can someone please tell me who's decision it was to bring in Paul Hart?
Now I know it's Flavio he gives the final nod, but surely it wasn't Flavio he said 'Go get me Paul Hart'. Surely Flavio was advised on this decision, I don't believe it was Flavio who identified Paul Hart as the man he wanted to manage us to the end of the season.
Listening to Talksport on Friday it was suggested it was Paladini who felt that Hart demonstrated no passion in training and he informed the players he was getting sacked. Then apparently Paladini ran to Falvio and told him he needed to be sack Hart.
I found this quote from an article in The Guardian
Briatore co-owns QPR with Bernie Ecclestone and Lakshmi Mittal and it is the Italian who takes the major decisions, assisted by Gianni Paladini, the club Chairman and Director of Football, according to one former coach. The coach, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said: “Paladini has a big say in the day-to-day running as Briatore is always in and out of the country. The owners there do love football but possibly they can get too involved and don’t leave it to the Manager and the staff. But what’s happening there now with all the Managers is making QPR laughable.”
Now taking this consideration and the pressures Falvio was under with his F1 Court Case at the time of Harts appointment would it be unwise to assume that it was infact Paladini who brought him in.
Then finally we come to Peterangers revelation on another site at the start of the transfer window about a fall out with Hart and the Board over our transfer policy. This was dismissed by some but then Nodge later revealed that Hart had sorted 2 good deals for Ashdown & Smith only to be told it was not within his remit by Paladini to sort out transfers. (I'm sure there was another quote about this in the press as well).
The press are fingering Flavio with the blame and that is understandable given he is the man at the top. However, it would appear Paladini is getting off lightly yet again and especially in media circles.
Did Paladini not get the yes man he was expecting in Hart? A bit like Sousa who was harder to remove so a smear campaign had to be instigated to get rid of him of him instead.
I just want an answer to my original question from someone who knows and I'll work the rest out for myself.
Comment