Paladini Not Happy about abuse on MB's?

[W12_Ranger]

According to a thread on Indyr's by SloughBilly

http://www.indyrs.co.uk/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9267

"About supporters complaining about him on message boards."


"Just to let you know he was overheard by somebody at the ground yesterday and making sure anybody within earshot could hear what he was saying . He is not happy because he saved the club I will leave it at that as they sack people for sneezing there."



Probably will get past off as nonesense but it might help to explain the London Informer article put out by the club following Clive Whittinghams post which did the rounds on all the forums.

http://www.londoninformer.co.uk/lond...3489-25546506/

[Neil]

I dont blame him

[m_cooper]

he can just go forth and multiply

[oldhoop]

Link doesn't work!

As far as GP is concerned;

A) So what?

B) Does anyone really think that he is bothered by what is said on the MBs?

C) Perhaps some people have got him sussed and that is the issue!

[W12_Ranger]

Link doesn't work!

As far as GP is concerned;

A) So what?

B) Does anyone really think that he is bothered by what is said on the MBs?

C) Perhaps some people have got him sussed and that is the issue!

According to Scott Jones the other day half of everything which is written on MB's gets printed off by the club, so my inclination would be yes.

[m_cooper]

good

[geejaybee]

What does Palidini expect - our respect.You have to earn that,and you'll earn nothing if you can't tell the truth.

[Goddard]

Well if they do read it.... For me it's not about GP as a person, and I don't mind a bit if he is a slippery customer, or not.

Unfortunately for him, he currently occupies a role at QPR that is not needed.
Director Of Football. It's a structure that is not working, and he holds that role.

I have no problem whatsoever with GP being given another role within the club, and I do genuinely believe that he has done good things for the club in the past, under very tricky circumstances.

All I want is for a good manager to come in and be allowed to do his job his way, within a set budget, with set targets.

The problem is that the extreme views on GP as a person are the ones that catch the eye on messageboards, and are the ones that are wrongly taken as the majority opinion of normal QPR fans.
Whereas I honestly believe that most QPR fans simply aren't that fussed about the bloke... they just want the team to be given the best possible chance to succeed, and don't see his role as helpful towards that.
That's certainly where I stand on this.

For most, it's not personal towards him... but you can see why it looks that way to him, and others.

[oldhoop]

Well if they do read it.... For me it's not about GP as a person, and I don't mind a bit if he is a slippery customer, or not.

Unfortunately for him, he currently occupies a role at QPR that is not needed.
Director Of Football. It's a structure that is not working, and he holds that role.

I have no problem whatsoever with GP being given another role within the club, and I do genuinely believe that he has done good things for the club in the past, under very tricky circumstances.

All I want is for a good manager to come in and be allowed to do his job his way, within a set budget, with set targets.

The problem is that the extreme views on GP as a person are the ones that catch the eye on messageboards, and are the ones that are wrongly taken as the majority opinion of normal QPR fans.
Whereas I honestly believe that most QPR fans simply aren't that fussed about the bloke... they just want the team to be given the best possible chance to succeed, and don't see his role as helpful towards that.
That's certainly where I stand on this.

For most, it's not personal towards him... but you can see why it looks that way to him, and others.

very good post and sums up the feelings of a lot of posters very eloquently

[IsleworthRanger]

Well if they do read it.... For me it's not about GP as a person, and I don't mind a bit if he is a slippery customer, or not.

Unfortunately for him, he currently occupies a role at QPR that is not needed.
Director Of Football. It's a structure that is not working, and he holds that role.

I have no problem whatsoever with GP being given another role within the club, and I do genuinely believe that he has done good things for the club in the past, under very tricky circumstances.

All I want is for a good manager to come in and be allowed to do his job his way, within a set budget, with set targets.

The problem is that the extreme views on GP as a person are the ones that catch the eye on messageboards, and are the ones that are wrongly taken as the majority opinion of normal QPR fans.
Whereas I honestly believe that most QPR fans simply aren't that fussed about the bloke... they just want the team to be given the best possible chance to succeed, and don't see his role as helpful towards that.
That's certainly where I stand on this.

For most, it's not personal towards him... but you can see why it looks that way to him, and others.

Very good post

[W12_Ranger]

Well if they do read it.... For me it's not about GP as a person, and I don't mind a bit if he is a slippery customer, or not.

Unfortunately for him, he currently occupies a role at QPR that is not needed.
Director Of Football. It's a structure that is not working, and he holds that role.

I have no problem whatsoever with GP being given another role within the club, and I do genuinely believe that he has done good things for the club in the past, under very tricky circumstances.

All I want is for a good manager to come in and be allowed to do his job his way, within a set budget, with set targets.

The problem is that the extreme views on GP as a person are the ones that catch the eye on messageboards, and are the ones that are wrongly taken as the majority opinion of normal QPR fans.
Whereas I honestly believe that most QPR fans simply aren't that fussed about the bloke... they just want the team to be given the best possible chance to succeed, and don't see his role as helpful towards that.
That's certainly where I stand on this.

For most, it's not personal towards him... but you can see why it looks that way to him, and others.

At first I never had an issue with Paladini, infact I thought he was doing a good job having brought investment to the club. Then I became uncertain about his role as DOF. Now I'm convinced that the man has to go, I can't see how any respectable football manager can get with their job at this club with him here. Ignoring all the mudslinging and accusations that is bottom line for me, I can't see this club moving forward whilst he is any role or capacity at the club due to the interference.

[Bernie's Barnet]

Well if they do read it.... For me it's not about GP as a person, and I don't mind a bit if he is a slippery customer, or not.

Unfortunately for him, he currently occupies a role at QPR that is not needed.
Director Of Football. It's a structure that is not working, and he holds that role.

I have no problem whatsoever with GP being given another role within the club, and I do genuinely believe that he has done good things for the club in the past, under very tricky circumstances.

All I want is for a good manager to come in and be allowed to do his job his way, within a set budget, with set targets.

The problem is that the extreme views on GP as a person are the ones that catch the eye on messageboards, and are the ones that are wrongly taken as the majority opinion of normal QPR fans.
Whereas I honestly believe that most QPR fans simply aren't that fussed about the bloke... they just want the team to be given the best possible chance to succeed, and don't see his role as helpful towards that.
That's certainly where I stand on this.

For most, it's not personal towards him... but you can see why it looks that way to him, and others.

Sums up my feelings perfectly, and I suspect the feelings of most QPR fans if truth be told.

The question about pro or anti Paladini is always the wrong one in my view. The correct question to ask, and the one which almost always makes the answer to any question regards our club pretty easy to work out is, what is the answer which makes benefitting QPR the sole priority?

[Factamondo]

poor little gianni cant taka da stick..........#### him............we saved the world from the nazi's but still take stick off every ungratefull **** worldwide!

[westsussexranger]

i swear something was sung against ispwich couple of years back saw on bbc and he said to **** the *******s who sung it he saved the club they have no idea what hes done

whether the fans like you or not you shouldnt tell them to **** themselves otherwise youll lose more fans

i hate him anyway what he did to ollie to push him out of the club why couldnt he say youre not the type of person we want to take the club forwards like ranson and dowie at coventry

[Fez]

According to Scott Jones the other day half of everything which is written on MB's gets printed off by the club, so my inclination would be yes.

You would think if that was the case then they be able to do a better job of keeping the fans happy?

So either...

a) they don't do that
b) they don't give a toss about what the fans think