My problem with Faurlin, Pellicori and Alberti for that matter, is that I've actually been impressed with how we have used the loan market since the takeover. We brought De Carmine, Parejo and Ledesma all in on loan. If they fail they can be returned to their clubs and if the succeed hopefully a permanent deal could be made. If not at least they have been successful, which is no bad thing.
These three all have long contracts and we are now stuck with them if they have been deemed failures. Why couldn't they have been signed as loans as well?
These three all have long contracts and we are now stuck with them if they have been deemed failures. Why couldn't they have been signed as loans as well?
Comment