As a fan of football I could list 25 realistic signings that would undoubtedly improve our team. I'm afraid Danny Webber would not be one of them.
Now Danny Webber is not a bad footballer. At one stage at Watford he looked like he was going to be a top player but since he was injured he has lost his pace which was undoubtedly his biggest asset.
I'm not being negative or being impatient it is just that we don't need Danny Webber. We've got Routledge/Simpson/Ephraim/Balanta all of whom are a similar type of player offering the same attributes.
We need a big, strong, mobile 'old fashioned' centre forward who can hold the ball up and win flick ons. Someone who can play the Emile Heskey role and be a foil for the players previously mentioned. Now Dave Kitson would be a perfect signing and I'm pleased he is being mentioned in the rumour section, but the vibes I seem to get are that we want to loan him rather than buy? Why oh why would we lose out on a player that we desperately need, why are the board not prepared to take any risks?
Now Danny Webber is not a bad footballer. At one stage at Watford he looked like he was going to be a top player but since he was injured he has lost his pace which was undoubtedly his biggest asset.
I'm not being negative or being impatient it is just that we don't need Danny Webber. We've got Routledge/Simpson/Ephraim/Balanta all of whom are a similar type of player offering the same attributes.
We need a big, strong, mobile 'old fashioned' centre forward who can hold the ball up and win flick ons. Someone who can play the Emile Heskey role and be a foil for the players previously mentioned. Now Dave Kitson would be a perfect signing and I'm pleased he is being mentioned in the rumour section, but the vibes I seem to get are that we want to loan him rather than buy? Why oh why would we lose out on a player that we desperately need, why are the board not prepared to take any risks?
Comment