If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
At least it's only short term... some logic applied at least.
Almost as alarming was the quote about 8 different CB partnerships in a row.....surely at some point the penny will drop as to why we keep leaking goals and throwing games. The fulcrum of any side is a stable defence (as we had!!) who get to play together all the time and know how each other will think and act. They then gain confidence as a unit with the keeper... we simply don't have that now and the results show it.
oh dear. Another step in the wrong direction. Just when we are crying out for stability we end up taking on a couple of temps.
Which players will be signing this january knowing the bloke who signed them
( according to the famous "itk" boys the manager chooses his players) could possibly not be around come May?
This type of contract suits the "hire and fire" style the club has adopted, it shows how impatient we are at the top as well as the fans.
Basically, if the board GENUINELY believe that these two are the correct choice, then why not offer them an 18 month contract and back them fully?
Comment