Jim has not been as good as many have made out. As I said the other day, and also another poster looked at in more detail today...we had NOTHING more than a purple patch. One or two lucky wins and too many poor draws which we should have won with the tools we have does not look good whatsoever. We've dropped far too many 'easy' points and that's down to the managers choices. We had the 2nd best defence in the league last season, so he's clearly messed up somewhere, hasn't he?
Now...I very much dissagree with the way this has happened again, but I sincerely doubt he had much longer with us either way. This does not make right Flabbio's get out clause for gross misconduct, but it does also say to me that this would have been their intentions anyway.
The players clearly don't like the manager and this is blatantly effecting their performances on the pitch. None of them are enjoying their football and Aggy's lack of celebration just captures the feeling amongst the squad. Nobody knows where they stand. Some of his clear favourites are allowed to perform poorly, but the ones that we know are better can be dropped just because they won't dissagree.
Something isn't right here, and rightly or wrongly, Jim's position is in my opinion the most expendable, therefore the more likely to be replaced. Again, this is not the right way to do it, but still the right decission.
Dissagree with what you like. Just my opinion.
Edit...I meat 'agree'
Donut :embarrassed:
Now...I very much dissagree with the way this has happened again, but I sincerely doubt he had much longer with us either way. This does not make right Flabbio's get out clause for gross misconduct, but it does also say to me that this would have been their intentions anyway.
The players clearly don't like the manager and this is blatantly effecting their performances on the pitch. None of them are enjoying their football and Aggy's lack of celebration just captures the feeling amongst the squad. Nobody knows where they stand. Some of his clear favourites are allowed to perform poorly, but the ones that we know are better can be dropped just because they won't dissagree.
Something isn't right here, and rightly or wrongly, Jim's position is in my opinion the most expendable, therefore the more likely to be replaced. Again, this is not the right way to do it, but still the right decission.
Dissagree with what you like. Just my opinion.
Edit...I meat 'agree'
Donut :embarrassed:
Comment