Why would Buzsaky lie?

[Voiceofreason]

well?

[sirpiechucker]

To force out a manager who is reluctant to play him?

[Rieger]

why what has he said? (I mean a direct quote please)

[rblockells]

He said that he is focussed on Monday's game at West Brom

[Voiceofreason]

why what has he said? (I mean a direct quote please)

Ask the so called in the know people who started the rumors and are now moaning that he could get the sack.

[Voiceofreason]

To force out a manager who is reluctant to play him?

He has played the majority of games under magilton hasn't he?

[WeAreQPR12]

Yeah he has....in a friggin position he hates!!!!

[robloft]

sounds to me like Buz threw a hissy fit (prima donna) because Mag (wrongly as he only played 15 minutes) had a go at him re monday night's performance.

Then he described a head to head contact (in your face type thing) as a headbut and now he can't really retract it!

If the rest of the players back up Buz's version/interpretation and Mag has his staff to back him up who do the club (and eventually a tribunal) believe?

What I think is inevitable is that Madge has no future at the club and, IMHO Buz should be klicked out too

[MYU_QPR]

I would agree with that!

[sirpiechucker]

He has played the majority of games under magilton hasn't he?

Yes but he has been blamed for things that are clearly not his fault. As an attacking midfielder is it his fault if the defence and the defensive midfielders have conceded 5 goals?

He has scored 7 goals this season, which is a very good return for a midfielder. Played in the right position with the right tactics he could turn that 7 into 17 by the end of the season.

[paulmason]

Magilton and others may have said there was not head but, but they have admitted going head to head with Buzz, that alone is aggressive, unacceptable and in 99% of other jobs, you would be shown the door. Add to that offering out another player, he has to go.

[Bernie's Barnet]

Magilton and others may have said there was not head but, but they have admitted going head to head with Buzz, that alone is aggressive, unacceptable and in 99% of other jobs, you would be shown the door. Add to that offering out another player, he has to go.

In isolation you are right, but I think the main issue here is that Magilton getting over aggressive physically with players is not an isolated incident. It allegedly happened at Donny with Taarabt, it allegedly happened at half time at Exeter, there was allegedly another incident during or after the Middlesboro game. Doing it once may have an impact, doing it again and again makes you look like a clueless bully that has to resort to violence to make a point. I'm sorry, but that doesn't add up to a competent manager in any industry.

[qblockpete]

My take

He got subbed after 62 minutes against Boro, then was made sub for the Watford game.

Must think he is good enough to play.

We don't yet know if he lied, mind you. Is an internal investigation going on

[eghamR]

Can't see how he lied ...there must have been 20/25 other people in that changing room that saw what went on ...some players will like JM ...others might not like him so much but I should think if there was a major injustice going on the players would pipe up and say so.

[Spencer]

I think there is more to this than just a hissy fit.If true, the comment about the rest of the team having not backed magilton in front of Briatore speaks volumes.Trouble is, everyone seems to have their own opinions of what has and what should happen to two individuals when in fact no one knows exactly whats has happened.

I would like to say then when the truth comes out , the the right person is dealt with accordingly, but if i remember correctly, when Sousa left, there were two different versions.That's why there is a divide of opinions about his departure.Who do we beleive??

Messeageboards are great, but sometimes it caused a divide because we are unable to get to the bottom of subjects and wrong information gets put out.