team for WBA?

[QPR1234]

what you reckon?

id like to see

cerny

ramage stewart gorkks borrowdale

routledge legs faurlin buzsaky

agyemang simpson



only reason for legs to be played is to tackle WBA .. i know however he will tackle them only to give the ball back but i just dont rate watson.. which is a huge shame coz ive seen how good he can be. pat and simpson may work with faurlin picking the passes - wouldnt play taarabt on basis of him potentially being disruptive.. even tho buzsaky is low on confidence i reckon starting him monday may reap some rewards.

if we lose 3/4 nil but show some fight and passion to at least try and win the game i wont be as bothered as what i was after yesterday.

[rangersroar]

Are you Magilton in disguise ?

[Fez]

Cerny
Connolly Stewart Gorkks Borrowdale
Routledge Watson Buzsaky Faulin Taarabt
Simpson

[megahoop]

play the under 18s

[QPR1234]

Are you Magilton in disguise ?

who would you start with honestly...

we dont exactly have a great choice..

[terry ball]

Cerny

Connolly Stewart gorkks Borrowdale

Leigertwood

routledge Buzsaky Faurlin Tarabatt

Simpson

this is the team that jim should play, and more importantly in these positions. Buzz in his best position, legs in just in front of the back four covering either flank and with plenty of pace out wide with adel and Wayne. Connolly is now the only player out of position but is still pretty useful anywhere across the back 4. I have opted for legs over Watson as he is taller and should be better in the air defensively.

[HammersmithR]

Definitely get Gorks and Connolly back in the side.

[QPR1234]

Definitely get Gorks and Connolly back in the side.

reckon connolly will be fit? if so id put him ahead of ramage

[QPR-FOREVER-N-EVER]

Watson is not good enough for me..I hope we dont buy him
No disrespect to Faurlin but apart from one or two good through balls what else does he offer the team attacking wise?! I dont think he can run with the ball LOL