Paolo Sousa..MERGED THREADS

[Funky]

Well I'm sure he earns money from his work with Permium TV (QPR Player), so with the endless links from this site to that site there is the answer Barry. I'm sure there is someone out there who can also break down to everyone else how you can make money out of such a forum like this?

As for putting an exact figure on what Pete makes from this site what a daft thing to say, can you tell me how much I have sitting in my bank account?

Exactly.....discussion closed Mr Chuckle.

Your more than happy to make accusations regarding profit I was just asking you to back up your ramberlings with some facts ?

Pete works for Premium TV I'm sure what he earns is his business.

Mr Chuckle...ouch that hurts how is Clungey these days last I heard he had banned himself from this board and posts on Reports site.

Pete will be gutted it's probably eating into his huge profit margins.

[qblockpete]

w12ranger

to be honest I'm more passionate about beating Ipswich then looking back on a manager who may but probably won't get promoted with SWANSEA

[Bluehoop]

W12Ranger, from reading this board from time to time, it is clear that QBP adopts the stance of a politician who doesn't want to answer a straight forward question and tries to be clever with the answer by either answering the question with another question or diverting the subject to something else entirely. The bloke is a puppet to his master Paladini, for that is clear.

It is also clear that he runs this website for profit and the 'rumours' that he peddles on this site are nothing more than fabrication on his part to ensure that he continues to lure the unsuspecting to keep tabs on the 'current situation'. Captain Clunge gets it pretty well spot on with his rating of QBP. In addition to this consider the amount of irrelevant threads begun by QBP, asking either poll questions or thoughts on subjects that quite frankly ar designed to do nothing more than provide more 'hits' to this site. But as I have said before, it puzzles me why people keep on replying. (yep I know that I am posting again, against my better judgement), but the way that the Sousa campaign was orchestrated makes my blood boil. Sousa is a gentleman and did not deserve the treatment that he suffered from Paladini or the campaign that was orchestrated on this board or at matches with chants demanding that the team play a 4-4-2 formation, which I witnessed on a few occasions during last season, (Barnsley away springs to mind). It all ties in, whatever QBP may deny, but remember the reason why Paladini called Sousa a c**t at Derby, it was because we were playing one forward that evening. Coincidence? Not in a million years.

In the other thread where QBP made a 'reply', he mentioned that during the Ipswich home match we played with just De Carmine up front, whilst leaving Helguson on the bench. Well lets also remember who Helguson was signed by, Paladini, and for how much, £1million and with no bloody medical. The bloke was and remained a crock for most of last season, and when he did play his diabolical finishing in front of goal probably cost us the points that could have seen us achieve play-off status.

Truth is sometimes uncomfortable to admit, especially when it undermines the position of a certain individual that could effect his 'special status' with other individuals. And the biggest laugh of the lot? Guess who was instrumental in starting the '****-taking' chants at Forest the other week against players signed by our glorious DOF? Yep, the bloke who came to his seat one minute before kick-off and to my misfortune was two seats from me.

A clear and written, as well as published statement (of what the poster purports to be fact, with no qualification or hint of allegation) which if Pete can show he does not "run this site for profit" is a very open and shut case of falsely damaging his personal reputation - or in English - libel. :shocked:

I'm sure the damages payable for such an act would be a welcome injection of cash into the running of what is generally a great web site for the benefit of all fans at, I suspect, a good deal of expense to those owning and/or running it.

Libelious statements can be very humiliating, generally to those making them without the wherewithal to support/sustain their position, nor indeed with the common sense to qualify their beliefs.

In my humble, unqualified, opinion, of course

[BennyBoyRs]

Did anyone see Hells Kitchen USA last night?

[qblockpete]

you plum

[Rangersw12]

A clear and written, as well as published statement (of what the poster purports to be fact, with no qualification or hint of allegation) which if Pete can show he does not "run this site for profit" is a very open and shut case of falsely damaging his personal reputation - or in English - libel. :shocked:

I'm sure the damages payable for such an act would be a welcome injection of cash into the running of what is generally a great web site for the benefit of all fans at, I suspect, a good deal of expense to those owning and/or running it.

Libelious statements can be very humiliating, generally to those making them without the wherewithal to support/sustain their position, nor indeed with the common sense to qualify their beliefs.

In my humble, unqualified, opinion, of course

On the flip side didn't Pete say that Sousa would of profited from a transfer of a left back and I don't remember him ever backing his accusation up

[BennyBoyRs]

No, seriously...it was funny.

How about Gavin and Stacey?
It was the final episode of series one.

[W12_Ranger]

w12ranger, tell me how I am making money on this site ?

All is it just another smear?

Some have tried to say I supported another club, now this. w12 ranger you and your cronies should give up.

Listen I have nothing against those with an entreprenurial mindset, fair play if you are able to run a successful website and business and make money from it.

What I'm trying to do is get to to the bottom of is why a Smear Campaign of Paulo Sousa implemented by yourself took place. You can't hide behind footballing reasons as Sousa was proving himself as a competent coach that is the bottom line. I and many others alike believe that there were more sinister motives at play.

The only way I can explain you make money from the site is by increasing subscriptions to QPR Player via hits directly from this site. People then have to subscribe to Player to get the full benefit, you collect commission. Personally I don't think that is particulary bad thing if you don't have any kind of agenda, unfortunatly I don't believe you fit that profile. I'm fairly certain some internet whizkids out there can explain a few others.

[scott_jones]

I watched some hardcore pron last night but only as there was a bottle of Archers Vea in the background. It was a horrendously bad alocopop that I had to flog to all the pubs in the UK for 6 months...every time i sold a pallet I felt guilty.

[qblockpete]

Rangerw12, as I say much of it cannot be used for the benefit of messageboards.

As for me making any kind of profit from this site, think that claim should backed up, as its an accusation made by two people on this very thread.

[qblockpete]

bennyboys

I do like gavin and Stacey very funny

[W12_Ranger]

No, not sensitive information

So do you think Paulo Sousa wouldn't have found the content of that post to be disclosing sensitive and confidential information about squad, tactics and what goes on behind closed doors?

Do think Super Paulo might have taken offence at the ability of the club to leak information about private team affairs?

[BennyBoyRs]

Good tv all round last night. I had the night off from the missus so I made the best of it.

FIFA 10 got rocked out too.

[nobby]

w12ranger and nobby.

If you are going to make accusations that we make money, than please substantiate your claims within 10 days which is plenty of time or I see no reason why you both should be on this board.

What are you doing here anyway?. You cannot come on here making unfalse claims and expect us to be happy about it.

Ahhh, back to your old threats, if you don't like the poster, (I'm pleased by the way, as the feeling is quite literally mutual), then ban 'em. You should have been brought up in Stalin's Russia, then you could have got the KGB round to dispose of me! Now you are more than happy to smear the reputation of some outstanding supporters such as Paul Finney, but when the boot is on the other foot you won't come clean but just stand there and threaten. Bit like a schoolboy bully in my opinion.

And once again you do not cover the accusations about the treatment of Sousa and the usage of this board in that inglorious campaign of hate.

You see, even MYU has admitted that you make money from the site. Cost of advertising each month....£120, now this in my book is making money. Whether other overheads are higher than what income you are generating is irrelevant apart from the fact that you have done your sums wrong. Now if I was running a site then I would be saying to prospective advertisers that what you would get from the cost of your advertising is a miminum guarantee of x number of hits per week/day/month. After all, isn't this what pays for the whole cost of the internet, advertising, isn't this why Google is a multi-billionn dollar company. Face it QBP, you have to keep the interest going to ensure that the advertiser remains, and you do this by your rumour-moungering and relentless inane threads. Now what ever happened to those 'five signings' two that would be agreeable, one that would split the fan base and two that people would not care for?

[W12_Ranger]

Rangerw12, as I say much of it cannot be used for the benefit of messageboards.

As for me making any kind of profit from this site, think that claim should backed up, as its an accusation made by two people on this very thread.

I just backed it up but incase you missed the post


The only way I can explain you make money from the site is by increasing subscriptions to QPR Player via hits directly from this site. People then have to subscribe to Player to get the full benefit, you collect commission. Personally I don't think that is particulary bad thing if you don't have any kind of agenda, unfortunatly I don't believe you fit that profile. I'm fairly certain some internet whizkids out there can explain a few others.