There is nothing new here at all. Since the Blackburn win and the Newcastle blip there has only ever been two teams fighting it out. Man U and Ars then Man U and Chel.
Why? Because they had the cash. Same in every league everywhere. Annoys me when pundits say money doesn't buy success...because it does in every league in the world.
However, RA will not keep spending the 200 million a year for Chelsea.
We are also one club that has the "potential" to spend that money - so smile you miserable lot!
Anyway, if rules changes that are being pushed come into play, where a club can spend in relation to its revenue (like in Gremany) things will get FAR, FAR worse, not better. It may mean City and Chelsea are screwed, but it means no one will ever get near Man U.
Why? Because they had the cash. Same in every league everywhere. Annoys me when pundits say money doesn't buy success...because it does in every league in the world.
However, RA will not keep spending the 200 million a year for Chelsea.
We are also one club that has the "potential" to spend that money - so smile you miserable lot!
Anyway, if rules changes that are being pushed come into play, where a club can spend in relation to its revenue (like in Gremany) things will get FAR, FAR worse, not better. It may mean City and Chelsea are screwed, but it means no one will ever get near Man U.
Comment