Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Plan B??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Plan B??

    When Plan A works we play some fabulous football and the results this season have been better than for many a year. However when we are one nil down with 20 mins to go it means that we have failed to score for 70 mins and something needs to change. Throwing on Agyemang and Pellicori hasn't worked. Injecting pace and creativity with the returns of Balanta and Cook will give us something different to break down a defence but if there isn’t someone there to stick the ball in the back of the net what’s the point?

    The skills of Routledge, Taraabt and Buzsaky have been a delight to watch. Those like me who enjoy watching players who get stuck in and put in the hard graft are delighted with the likes of Mahon (before injury), Watson and especially Faurlin. Players who leave nothing in the tank at the end of the 90 minutes. If Watson and Reid leave us we will be short in this area but this isn’t a weak area. Neither is our creativity and neither is central defence. We have successfully transferred Leigertwood into an attacking right back and Williams, Borrowdale and Ramage are all solid if not spectacular. I can find very few negatives throughout the squad. Simpson has been a revelation, Vine had started to improve but unfortunately that where our attacking prowess finishes. We have no Plan B because we have no strength in reserve.

    Until we sign Messi and Ronaldo plan A can always be stronger. But for a Championship team our first XI is up there with the best. However if injury strikes who do we turn too? Our Plan A only works because 2 of the “fab 4” aren’t ours. What happens if Spurs or Arsenal recall their players? For two years now names such as Folan and Fallon have been mentioned because the manager of the day has wanted a brute upfront. Neither though is particularly good. However we play in a league with the likes of Hulse, Henderson, Best, Rasiak and Stead who are play this brutish role. Even if they can’t all be described as brutish they all give their clubs alternative options. All of them play for clubs currently below us in the division and all of them will have seen our progress and will see our potential. Plan B for me has to be to sign one if not two of these players and then to use them in matches both away from Loftus Road when chances are few and far between and you need a big man to hold up the ball. And also these players would be ideal for a struggling side needing to get back in a match.

    Routledge of course has scored goals this season but he has also shown that he isn’t a natural finisher who will score 15 goals playing upfront. He is better suited to terrorising left backs and putting in crosses for a big man. Or cutting in from the wing and linking up play with the other creative players. For me Routledge is a waste upfront and the sooner he is reverted back to the wing the better. He is only playing there due to the lack of depth upfront. Is it time we recall Helguson? Surely in January we finally sign a big man who gives us alternative options.

  • #2
    I've been asking myself the same question.

    Plan B should in place and every player should be aware of this when our sub takes place. Things need to be changed round and the manager and players should know what that is when it takes place.

    Right know they just bring players on with no plan, it's more hoping that we'll get a goal.

    Comment


    • #3
      Well said Sirpie
      But for a lot on here big man = hoof it, and they want to see the attractive football we have been playing of late.
      But a big man does not always have to be a target for a ball from the back, but it's nice to have the option if needed. Why I think we need a big man is for crosses from the good wing men we have and vitally, at wide set pieces where we have been woeful this season.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Pal View Post
        Well said Sirpie
        But for a lot on here big man = hoof it, and they want to see the attractive football we have been playing of late.
        But a big man does not always have to be a target for a ball from the back, but it's nice to have the option if needed. Why I think we need a big man is for crosses from the good wing men we have and vitally, at wide set pieces where we have been woeful this season.
        I think what people have to understand is if they've watched 70 minutes of attractive football but we haven't scored and don't look like doing so then they should be prepared to have to watch "hoof it" football. I don't think big man has to mean hoof it football but even if it does then there is a straight choice between sticking with a plan that isn't working and lose or try something different and we may get results.

        Comment


        • #5
          We have always had dimunative strikers, but I would like to see a big man, with a decent heading ability, play with a skilful smaller pacy forward, with the nouse to spot a flick on.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by sirpiechucker View Post
            When Plan A works we play some fabulous football and the results this season have been better than for many a year. However when we are one nil down with 20 mins to go it means that we have failed to score for 70 mins and something needs to change. Throwing on Agyemang and Pellicori hasn't worked. Injecting pace and creativity with the returns of Balanta and Cook will give us something different to break down a defence but if there isn’t someone there to stick the ball in the back of the net what’s the point?

            The skills of Routledge, Taraabt and Buzsaky have been a delight to watch. Those like me who enjoy watching players who get stuck in and put in the hard graft are delighted with the likes of Mahon (before injury), Watson and especially Faurlin. Players who leave nothing in the tank at the end of the 90 minutes. If Watson and Reid leave us we will be short in this area but this isn’t a weak area. Neither is our creativity and neither is central defence. We have successfully transferred Leigertwood into an attacking right back and Williams, Borrowdale and Ramage are all solid if not spectacular. I can find very few negatives throughout the squad. Simpson has been a revelation, Vine had started to improve but unfortunately that where our attacking prowess finishes. We have no Plan B because we have no strength in reserve.

            Until we sign Messi and Ronaldo plan A can always be stronger. But for a Championship team our first XI is up there with the best. However if injury strikes who do we turn too? Our Plan A only works because 2 of the “fab 4” aren’t ours. What happens if Spurs or Arsenal recall their players? For two years now names such as Folan and Fallon have been mentioned because the manager of the day has wanted a brute upfront. Neither though is particularly good. However we play in a league with the likes of Hulse, Henderson, Best, Rasiak and Stead who are play this brutish role. Even if they can’t all be described as brutish they all give their clubs alternative options. All of them play for clubs currently below us in the division and all of them will have seen our progress and will see our potential. Plan B for me has to be to sign one if not two of these players and then to use them in matches both away from Loftus Road when chances are few and far between and you need a big man to hold up the ball. And also these players would be ideal for a struggling side needing to get back in a match.

            Routledge of course has scored goals this season but he has also shown that he isn’t a natural finisher who will score 15 goals playing upfront. He is better suited to terrorising left backs and putting in crosses for a big man. Or cutting in from the wing and linking up play with the other creative players. For me Routledge is a waste upfront and the sooner he is reverted back to the wing the better. He is only playing there due to the lack of depth upfront. Is it time we recall Helguson? Surely in January we finally sign a big man who gives us alternative options.
            I'll keep this short as basically what you've said is spot on....we have no Plan B without a target man - Helguson would be handy right now but the recall is not going to happen. I assume we will sign a target man in January but until we sign this brute of a striker there is no Plan B.

            Plan A is basically how we playing at the moment and even with the arrival of a target man I wouldn't be tempted to change things to much. Plan B is a flat 4-4-2 with Cook and Routledge as conventional wingers - IMO there is no room for Taarabt or Buzsaky in Plan B.

            How I see it assuming our loanees are still with us in Jan

            Plan A

            Buzsaky-Faurlin-Watson-Taarabt
            --------------Routledge-------------
            --------------Simpson----------------

            Plan B

            Routledge-Faurlin-Watson-Cook

            ------Simpson-A Target Man------


            For the record I think Magilton will move for Stead in Jan.
            Last edited by W12_Ranger; 03-12-2009, 09:59 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              The problem is you aren't going to get a quality target man if he is just going to sit on the bench on the off chance of getting 20mins if we have failed to score!

              Comment


              • #8
                I actually agree with W12 Ranger,i also suspect Stead will join from Ipswich,which by the way does not fill me with confidence.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Fez View Post
                  The problem is you aren't going to get a quality target man if he is just going to sit on the bench on the off chance of getting 20mins if we have failed to score!
                  Plan B needn't be used when Plan A fails, it can be used instead off.

                  Players should be signed to bolster the squad not become the focal point of the team.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Well said SirPie - I've been on about this Plan B for ages.
                    What some fans have to realise is that just by buying a big strong lump does not mean we are going to change the syle of football - but use it if Plan A doesn't work. Let's face it at the moment when it doesn't work we just roll over - Leicester being the prime example - so 15-20 mins of balls into a big striker might just bring the ugly goals that the pretty stuff failed to deliver.
                    And as someone said earlier, sometimes (against certain teams) Plan B should become plan A.
                    #standuptocancer
                    #inyourfacecancer

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X