Is 4 goals from 39 shots good enough..

[Controversy]

Sometimes passing is the better option, just because you create a chance doesn't mean you have to take it. In the first half taraabt took a shoot from a tight angle that he could of cut back to simpson or watson who were running into the box, taraabt needs to assist more end of

[Quaz]

Yeah and for that pleasure of having a very skilful showboat, playing out of position, we are probably 10-12 points fewer than we would have, if we had a goal-scorer who focused on putting the ball in the net.

He is a great player but you need to remember you get points by scoring goals and winning games, not for doing step overs and making players look like fools.

lmfao....according to you it was the no good #### wits who were at fault for dropping points...now its tarrabt's for not playing on the left......is he the only player who has missed then?....you just like to moan like an old woman.

[WeAreQPR12]

That WASN'T tarrabt.
I know the excact incident and infact that was Simpson.
It was crazy and very very selfish but I thought Tarrabt passed it more than usual and had a good game!

[Controversy]

there was more than one chance, and he did we where in ellersie and called it that he was gonna shoot, i just think he should pass more

[paulmason]

Quaz - The problem is simple, Routledge and Tarabbt are best suited on the wing where they rip people to shreds and its funny how we created so many chancesfrom the right in the 2nd half when Routledge danced past everyone or was I seeing things.

I honestly believe that if we had Beckford or Best, there are some people on here would still want tarabbt supporting Simpson.

(Magilton would probably play Beckford or Best on the wing any way)

[silvercue]

it often depends what area of the pitch you shoot from. Poachers will have a higher return as they shoot from close range. he isn't a natural striker but his contribution is very positive.

[Quaz]

Quaz - The problem is simple, Routledge and Tarabbt are best suited on the wing where they rip people to shreds and its funny how we created so many chancesfrom the right in the 2nd half when Routledge danced past everyone or was I seeing things.

I honestly believe that if we had Beckford or Best, there are some people on here would still want tarabbt supporting Simpson.

(Magilton would probably play Beckford or Best on the wing any way)

not disputing they should play on the wing......but without any top strikers what other options does JM have until the window opens?

and with rumours that simpson could go back it only gets worse rather than better.

[paulmason]

Tarabbt and Routledge should be the first names on the team sheet, as wingers and they can swap wings as much as they want, but its funny how Magilton plays Tarabbt and Routledge in the hole behind Simpson, but he never lets Buzz have a go there, who is probably best suited in that role.

[Quaz]

Tarabbt and Routledge should be the first names on the team sheet, as wingers and they can swap wings as much as they want, but its funny how Magilton plays Tarabbt and Routledge in the hole behind Simpson, but he never lets Buzz have a go there, who is probably best suited in that role.

we can speculate as much as we like but we don't know what is said or happens at training......

[Del]

The shots tally isn't really the issue... it is a poor return becasue he's not a good finisher.

The real question is, should the greedy bar steward pass more often, rather than alienate his team mates by insisiting on shooting from anywhere looking for glory himself to the detriment of the team.... We all know the answer is yes.

Of course he can make CCC players look like clowns at times, and yes he has an abundance of tricks and skills, but the fans who are taken in by it all all deluding themselves. The fact is, if he had a better football brain and learnt when to shoot and when to put it on a plate easilly for a team mate, he could be quite exceptional. That is why he's so frustrating for me, glimpses of genius aside. Madge should make him watch videos of Henry when at Arsenal. Without doubt one of the best in the world in that era and all the ability in the world, but he was so great because when someone was in a better position he would tee them up instead of taking a less likely shot from a tight angle or shooting from 30 yards out. At the end of the season he nearly had as many assists as goals which speaks volumes.

[pkloft]

yes it is, Tarrabt will score 15 by the time we reach May.

yes it is!! for Taarabt to get his 15 goals he would need to have 146 shots at goal whereas Chopra would only need 46 shot at goal to get his 15 (going by the above stats) they are the FACTS Pete, you still OK with that

[hhrangers]

just look at the quality of some of them, compare preston to the chance he had saturday where he blasted it to the corner flag?

too inconsistent and also whittingham has scored like 6 penalties?

[Fez]

Without Tarrabt, we wouldn't even get the chances. Most of the time, he makes them himself.

Sirpie, you forgot the two penalties he has also won for us and the number of free-kicks

Spot on, he isn't a striker but he does score a few goals and will create countless others, even directly to have that quality of player in the team frees up other players etc.

He's not a great finisher though, most of our players aren't and I said before that had we finished better on Sat we would have won even conceeding the two goals!

[DylanQPR]

ronaldo scored 40 odd goals for man utd in a season but had ridiculously loads more chances, if you had someone who converted pretty much every 1 out of 2 chances he had, would be one of the best strikers in the world

[pkloft]

ronaldo scored 40 odd goals for man utd in a season but had ridiculously loads more chances, if you had someone who converted pretty much every 1 out of 2 chances he had, would be one of the best strikers in the world

dont think anyone expects that (1 out of 2 chances scored) 1 out of 4 or 5 would be acceptable, but 1 out of 10ish is very poor indeed :waaaht: