No Nothing #### wits

[paulmason]

Wingers as strikers and strikers as wingers.

Routledge as a winger, dynamic and brillant but behind Simpson is a waste of space, as is Tarabbt. Jim and John have to stop inventing the wheel and just lit it spin, the way it should. They have cost us 5pts in the last two games because of team selection, not the players.

[Receed R]

Wingers as strikers and strikers as wingers.

Routledge as a winger, dynamic and brillant but behind Simpson is a waste of space, as is Tarabbt. Jim and John have to stop inventing the wheel and just lit it spin, the way it should. They have cost us 5pts in the last two games because of team selection, not the players.

Magilton out ?

[paulmason]

Not at all, but let the players play where they create the most damege.

[themodfather]

stop tinkering!

the back 4 should be solid, it changes quicker than an x factor line up!

[Quaz]

Wingers as strikers and strikers as wingers.

Routledge as a winger, dynamic and brillant but behind Simpson is a waste of space, as is Tarabbt. Jim and John have to stop inventing the wheel and just lit it spin, the way it should. They have cost us 5pts in the last two games because of team selection, not the players.

what cost us is not having a striker to put more than 2 of the 27 chances in the back of the net.

[paulmason]

so the title of "No Nothing #### wits" sums them up for no realising we need one or two strikers ?

[Quaz]

so the title of "No Nothing #### wits" sums them up for no realising we need one or two strikers ?

wouldn't go as far as calling people #### wits just because they changed a few things.......will they become superstars if we get promoted......fickle...very fickle.

also they don't control the purse strings.

[THE FLYING COW]

well

well its quite simple kick hall out of the club hes useless.of he had not played
yesterday we would have won 2-1,bring back danny ****tu

[paulmason]

:chill:

wouldn't go as far as calling people #### wits just because they changed a few things.......will they become superstars if we get promoted......fickle...very fickle.

also they don't control the purse strings.

Yes you can, 5pts we have lost against ****e teams, what have they done right ?

[Quaz]

bring back danny ****tu

oh dear.

[Quaz]

:chill:


Yes you can, 5pts we have lost against ****e teams, what have they done right ?

sorry not going to bother...name me a team that hasn't dropped points to a so called ****e team......46 out of 46 and you would still moan........

[QPR1234]

taarabt i feel has the best first touch and control of a ball in our side.. his downfall is he is greedy.. he can play behind simpson no problems.. buzsaky hasnt really been given a run behind simpson.. would suggest he needs to be placed there tho

[qblockpete]

Okay we need strength in depth, but I will say until I'm blue in the face, we have scored 31 Goals. Yes, 31 goals thats more than Newcastle United, who are top fo the league table. If you get another striker in, you have to forfeit the skills of either Tarrabt or Buszsacky.

Its good to have strikers and have a bench of players than could turn the game, but defending is our problem not our goalscoring. Simpson has scored 8 that puts him on target for 20 for the season.

We scored two at home, that should win you the game. It didn't.

Someone like Best will give us a different dimension. I'm not saying we should not get a striker in, but thats not the problem why we drew so many at home, when we should have won them

[W12_Ranger]

Wingers as strikers and strikers as wingers.

Routledge as a winger, dynamic and brillant but behind Simpson is a waste of space, as is Tarabbt. Jim and John have to stop inventing the wheel and just lit it spin, the way it should. They have cost us 5pts in the last two games because of team selection, not the players.

You are a 24 carat plum, total over reaction to a couple of games where we have dropped points.

[qblockpete]

to be fair, thats me