I do read that because Pellicori has not set the world alight in about the 70 odd minutes he has played for QPR, the deal is somhow kind of dodgy?? You have to laugh.
Yet, with Faurlin because he has done well, no-one wishes to question the signing. Its nothing more than one working and the other signing not working, nothing untoward, but if you believe the critics of Pellicori (who have not even seen him play), then we have bought a complete dud?? If they had gone pre-season or gone to the reserves, you would see he has not done too bad.
I suspect he will go back to Italy in January, but to indicate some kind of dodgy deal is ludicrious and instead of offering biased views, why don't you just prove it, instead of talking in innuedo. These people probably drove Helguson out the door, spurting rubbish about him being unfit, because at the time he was not scoring, but it suited a political agenda. Now, he is making you look rather silly, because he cannot stop scoring for Watford.
Yet, with Faurlin because he has done well, no-one wishes to question the signing. Its nothing more than one working and the other signing not working, nothing untoward, but if you believe the critics of Pellicori (who have not even seen him play), then we have bought a complete dud?? If they had gone pre-season or gone to the reserves, you would see he has not done too bad.
I suspect he will go back to Italy in January, but to indicate some kind of dodgy deal is ludicrious and instead of offering biased views, why don't you just prove it, instead of talking in innuedo. These people probably drove Helguson out the door, spurting rubbish about him being unfit, because at the time he was not scoring, but it suited a political agenda. Now, he is making you look rather silly, because he cannot stop scoring for Watford.
Comment