Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did we lose to Licester?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16

    Comment


    • #17
      was in spain watching the game and LEICESTER where the better team on the night

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Harps 55 View Post
        was in spain watching the game and LEICESTER where the better team on the night
        WHERE the better team on the night??;D

        Comment


        • #19
          we were crap and leicester took advantage

          Comment


          • #20
            All the QPR team played poorly.

            Cerny - Sloppy goal kick for the winning goal
            Ramage - Too slow and failed to cut out the cross for the 1st goal
            Borrowdale -Too slow
            Stewart - dreadful game (possibly due to injury)
            Gorkks - Could have done better to prevent Fryatt's header, but probaly thought DS or at least, RC would have dealt with the cross.
            Hall - Did little after coming on.
            Leigertwood - failed to impose himself on the game, poor passing as usual
            Faurlin - put in the effort, but on the night, couldn't pass water, let alone the ball.
            Routledge - rarely got a good 1st touch to any ball.
            Buzsaky - failed to impress, and missed a great chance near the end after WR finally got to the by-line and put in a good pass.
            Simpson - rarely noticed he was playing, as the Licester defence won almost everything.
            Taarabt - scored a fine goal, but like everyone else was disappointing.

            Vine - won an early free kick and then disappeared from the game.
            Agyemang - did he come on as a sub, if he did, I don't recall him doing anything?

            Does that answer the question why QPR lost?

            However, QPR wont win nor play well in every game but that's football.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by stanistheman View Post
              All the QPR team played poorly.

              Cerny - Sloppy goal kick for the winning goal
              Ramage - Too slow and failed to cut out the cross for the 1st goal
              Borrowdale -Too slow
              Stewart - dreadful game (possibly due to injury)
              Gorkks - Could have done better to prevent Fryatt's header, but probaly thought DS or at least, RC would have dealt with the cross.
              Hall - Did little after coming on.
              Leigertwood - failed to impose himself on the game, poor passing as usual
              Faurlin - put in the effort, but on the night, couldn't pass water, let alone the ball.
              Routledge - rarely got a good 1st touch to any ball.
              Buzsaky - failed to impress, and missed a great chance near the end after WR finally got to the by-line and put in a good pass.
              Simpson - rarely noticed he was playing, as the Licester defence won almost everything.
              Taarabt - scored a fine goal, but like everyone else was disappointing.

              Vine - won an early free kick and then disappeared from the game.
              Agyemang - did he come on as a sub, if he did, I don't recall him doing anything?

              Does that answer the question why QPR lost?

              However, QPR wont win nor play well in every game but that's football.
              100% agree, we were poor on the night with only Gorkks and possibly Borrowdale playing anywhere near as well as they can. But we only lost 2-1 thnaks to a 'gift' even though we played poorly to a so called 'top side'.

              Plus my eldest (now called Jonah) saw his first game since Peterborough and obviously a lack of 'Pidgeon crap' also had a major influence.
              RIP: Doug, Sniffer and Pat

              Comment

              Working...
              X