could we go 3 at back

[themodfather]

stewart gorkss and connolly

as we are short of full backs ( ok williams back) but surely we need to mix it and adapt??

i think gorkss and connolly would be ok

olly would gamble and throw 3 up front....not suggesting going gung ho but leics mixed it up and we did not know what to do, no other PLAN.

[ScottJones]

bring back big dan i reckon

[m_cooper]

no,we look scared with 4 at the back;maybe we should go 5 as they look scared of the ball

[stainrodisalegend]

Stewart's only role from now on should be handing out the drinks at half time and putting on the rude boy music in the dressing room

[RLHoop]

Stewart's only role from now on should be handing out the drinks at half time and putting on the rude boy music in the dressing room

That's Halls job, much more 'rude boy' than Stewart.

[stan_bowles]

I would rather stick with what's working at the moment.With Connolly back things should be good defensively.

Williams--Gorkks--Connolly--Legs

[stainrodisalegend]

That's Halls job, much more 'rude boy' than Stewart.

Probably a close run thing. You have to hand it to Stewart that it must take some doing to be sent home from the Jamaica squad for bad behaviour...

Also, even before his very poor showing against Leicester,went off Stewart when he game that i/v pre-season saying he wanted to play in the premiership and didn't sound too bothered whether it was with QPR or not. Think he has to buck his ideas up as at the moment think Gorks is way ahead of him and Gorks is better suited to playing alongside Connolly.

[BennyBoyRs]

Stewart in a 3 man defence...are you sure?

I'd have trouble trusting him in a ten man steup.

[Robsondinho]

We haven't got the wingers who would be happy with playing wing back.