Holloway doesn't know the meaning of the word. How bad were those subs? FFS. We got down the tight twice all second half. The 34 fella kept running infield. Bidwell can't play forward. It's blindingly obvious. The only attacking threat we have is the long throw. LOL. Holloway really is clueless.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Width?
Collapse
X
-
Last time I saw us play two wingers it was disastrous. It was Wszolek and Bright at Barnsley and they were shockingly poor. I agree we badly lack any potency on the wings but I do feel the bulk of this problem is due to not having players who are any good in that position rather than Olly having some sort of aversion to having width in the team.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dogsrrs View PostSorry but we never had any width second half ? I must have been dreaming I thought I saw us going down both flanks and had good possession but have to say it was job done second half to Borough
Comment
-
Originally posted by dogsrrs View PostSorry but we never had any width second half ? I must have been dreaming I thought I saw us going down both flanks and had good possession but have to say it was job done second half to Borough
Comment
-
Yeah but chasing a game when losing 0-2 at home is not really indicative of our general set-up is it? I admit trying to solve our deficiencies is like sticking your finger in a dam springing leaks but a lack of genuine width that hurts/stretches the opposition consistently for 90mins is glaringly missing from our team this season.
Comment
-
Not a big fan of furlong but felt sorry for him today in the wing back role as he had no idea at all when to go wide and when to run forward not disimilar to Pawel and even Bidwell to a degree. This insistance of the midfield three with wing backs is killing any creativity we may have. The boys in those wing back roles need serious coaching on how to play that role and in bidwell's case he has not improved in that role in over 1 year playing it.
Comment
Comment