Perchy

[gator]

juggernaughts of internaional football!

England and Italy found that out vs Costa Rica in the last World Cup!

Seriously, these CONCACAF sides can be very tough to play especially in the heat!

[Hitman34]

just been confirmed that perch is out for several months.

its essential that we sign a right sided wingback.

[Shania]

Mackie will claim that position his own given a chance.

[Hitman34]

Mackie will claim that position his own given a chance.

that would be good, frees up a place up top for sylla to get a few starts.

[erikmata]

The thing is, no matter what we thought of him last season he really has started this one well. With Lynch also out it will be a totally new back three and even though Baptiste did quite well against Hull I can not see anything but liabilities unless Hall is back?

If not Hall and no new cb on loan, it must be Caulker playing? My first thought yesterday when he was substituted..

[Ginger Ninja]

Just to clarify, perch has been playing CB not RB or RWB. Seen people mention we need to sign a new RB or RWB but in reality we need more CB's if we want to play 3at the back

This

[CroydonCaptainJack]

Just to clarify, perch has been playing CB not RB or RWB. Seen people mention we need to sign a new RB or RWB but in reality we need more CB's if we want to play 3at the back

[swede]

Get this one in....use Mackie as a RWB when Pawels not an option, get in a new FW, case closed....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B3n_Gu%C3%B0ni_Fj%C3%B3luson

http://ifknorrkoping.se/truppen/jon-gudni-fjoluson

[swede]

If Ghoddos too expensive or chosing other than us...this could be a good-or better option

https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Buya_Turay

http://footballsierraleone.net/2016/12/13/sierra-leone-youngster-mohamed-buya-turay-commits-to-afc-united/

[lincoln ranger]

The thing is, no matter what we thought of him last season he really has started this one well. With Lynch also out it will be a totally new back three and even though Baptiste did quite well against Hull I can not see anything but liabilities unless Hall is back?

If not Hall and no new cb on loan, it must be Caulker playing? My first thought yesterday when he was substituted..

So CB's we got :

Nervous Ned
Hall (injured)
Lynch (injured)
Perch (injured)
Baptiste
Caulker

Christ we are in trouble if we are going to continue to play 3 at the back! Especially as we haven't got a pot to p!ss in and the club don't want to spend a penny on any additional players.

If they are not free, and not wanted by their club (loaned out to us), we may struggle to get any replacements in at all if this is the case?

[Tarbie]

So CB's we got :

Nervous Ned
Hall (injured)
Lynch (injured)
Perch (injured)
Baptiste
Caulker

Christ we are in trouble if we are going to continue to play 3 at the back! Especially as we haven't got a pot to p!ss in and the club don't want to spend a penny on any additional players.

If they are not free, and not wanted by their club (loaned out to us), we may struggle to get any replacements in at all if this is the case?

I'd actually switch to a 4-5-1 this weekend. I understand Ollie wants to play 3 at the back, but I just don't think we have the personnel to do it well with out current injuries!

[CroydonCaptainJack]

So CB's we got :

Nervous Ned
Hall (injured)
Lynch (injured)
Perch (injured)
Baptiste
Caulker

Christ we are in trouble if we are going to continue to play 3 at the back! Especially as we haven't got a pot to p!ss in and the club don't want to spend a penny on any additional players.

If they are not free, and not wanted by their club (loaned out to us), we may struggle to get any replacements in at all if this is the case?

To be fair it is quite unlucky having three out of six CBs out after half a dozen games

[erikmata]

I'd actually switch to a 4-5-1 this weekend. I understand Ollie wants to play 3 at the back, but I just don't think we have the personnel to do it well with out current injuries!

I think your are correct here, we'll have to change for a back four, unless Hamalainen could be the one but hardly?

I'd say we'll end up with Furlong (Kakay?)-Onouha-Baptiste-Bidwell as a back four.


I'd also say the club has been correct looking for cheap midfielders and defenders, thank god we'd got Baptiste for free!

[swede]

I'd actually switch to a 4-5-1 this weekend. I understand Ollie wants to play 3 at the back, but I just don't think we have the personnel to do it well with out current injuries!

Nooooo, don´t change the system and our way of playing. It´s a big part of why we´re been succesful this season. I´ll go with:

In goal (surprise...):Smithies

Back three of: Baptiste-Onouha-Bidwell

RWB: Wzolek

LWB: Manning

CMF: Freeman-Scowen-Luongo

FW: Mackie-Washingtion

[Tarbie]

Nooooo, don´t change the system and our way of playing. It´s a big part of why we´re been succesful this season. I´ll go with:

In goal (surprise...):Smithies

Back three of: Baptiste-Onouha-Bidwell

RWB: Wzolek

LWB: Manning

CMF: Freeman-Scowen-Luongo

FW: Mackie-Washingtion

I think that back 3 would be torn a new one down there.