Those big wages and long contracts are the reason we are where we are. As I said he has overseen the biggest wastage in English Football History.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fernandes talking the same old talk
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Norths View PostTicket sales wouldn't amount to much in the grand scheme of things
Going over old ground, but would be interested in the break down of the TV money and where it went.
We didn't really spend big on fees in the summer of 2012. Mainly freebies on ridiculous wages.C'Mon You Supaaaa!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1973 ranger View PostThe man has overseen the biggest wastage in English football history and now says he wants the right sort and this old ######. He said exactly the same after the 1st relegation from the premier league. The man is a total idiot when let near any sporting venture as Caterham showed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stanistheman View Postwhat are you on about now?
This is nothing to do with pre season friendlies.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kit View PostSame here, don't get it, yes he ballsed it up originally but now getting flak trying to do it right. Some people think we should just spend willy nilly but we aren't allowed to, simples as that and why shouldn't he try doing it differently after getting stung initially. My only concern is Olly but hope he proves me wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shepherds Mush View PostAs far as I recall he wrote off £60m and converted £180m to shares. Actual debt is reduced but TF's shareholding increased instead.
At no point was the £180m "written off" in the sense that TF won't see anything from it. He'd get a lot of it back on selling shares, which is why he needs the ground development in order to push up the interest in investors buying his shares at a good price.
Or something like that.
If he increased his share ownership of the club please state how much this increase was and what it moved from and to (i.e went from 30% to 40%) and if this did happen who lost out (as in Mittals went from 30% to 20% at the same time as is the nature of increasing your share). If he increased it by 10% then that would value the club at £600m as an example. Surely any maths you could come up with falls down here.
And if TF converted £180M to shares then he has taken all the debt on? In this instance thats £240m (£60m + £180,m) of debt so if he increased his shareholding by 10% then that value sht club at £2.4 billion?!?!? Which is why to me what your saying sounds way off the mark and misguided.
Also how do you know it was just TF that wrote the debt off? And if you do know that then why aren’t you ecstatic he did that when you link it to a property deal we all know isn’t going to happen and in doing so he would only increase the amount he or Tune Group has to stamp up to pay towards any future ground development? If he wants to invest an extra £60m+ in property then there are better ways to do that then writing off debt.
If you can quote some facts to back up your argument then fair enough
Also something to make clear for all others with issues on debt and our lack of spending. If you are moaning about the debt that he built up in good faith, with good intentions through experienced football managers like hughes and redknapp -then you absolutely cannot moan that now we arent still spending beyond our means.
EITHER YOU HAVE AN ISSUE WITH DEBT OR YOU DONTLast edited by Route One; 28-07-2017, 06:16 PM.
Comment
-
Comment