Problem is that Sylla is for sale. Like it or not.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Yeni as a striker?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by West Acton View PostSmith off bench for last 20mins is good option but he simply should not be considered as a starter if other players are fit. His presence kills our game as our players can't resist punting it
Sylla is a better player, better striker and better finisher and he has knack of scoring goals after smithies he should be first name on team sheets as strikers win you games.
What someone mentioned above about sylla and attacking three off him is spot on
There's not much that can be done when we have managers think they've found the right solution, only to play Washington and Smith as part of that attacking quartet and then, when they don't score goals, people blame the midfielders for not pitching in. Very simply, you play 4-2-3-1 with the 3-1 having good attacking instincts and chemistry, the 4-2 then don't become a burden to our goalscoring potential.
Have darting full backs who can actually run past the midfield duo to deliver crosses to switch things up, and because you now have two defensive midfielders who are focused on defending, they can drop deeper to cover."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
lynch hitting it up to smith i can't take much more of that if it's what we're going to be served up , most on here would want smith coming on as a late sub if bring him on if we need to nick a goal . but defenders can work him out easily and to watch the ball being punted up to him is torture
Comment
-
Originally posted by 72bus View Postlynch hitting it up to smith i can't take much more of that if it's what we're going to be served up , most on here would want smith coming on as a late sub if bring him on if we need to nick a goal . but defenders can work him out easily and to watch the ball being punted up to him is torture
#puntballnsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
Comment
-
Originally posted by nasser95 View PostI've been saying this for years and it's one of my qualms with the whole argument that Luongo, faurlin, etc didn't score enough goals. If we played a proper attacking quartet ahead of them, we wouldn't be complaining about the defensive midfielders doing their defensive duties.
There's not much that can be done when we have managers think they've found the right solution, only to play Washington and Smith as part of that attacking quartet and then, when they don't score goals, people blame the midfielders for not pitching in. Very simply, you play 4-2-3-1 with the 3-1 having good attacking instincts and chemistry, the 4-2 then don't become a burden to our goalscoring potential.
Have darting full backs who can actually run past the midfield duo to deliver crosses to switch things up, and because you now have two defensive midfielders who are focused on defending, they can drop deeper to cover.
Comment
-
Originally posted by knocker View PostSounds like we need a whole new team then according to you. Wouldn't disagree.
The issue is that managers never used their best combination of players together. If we call Yeni, Sylla, Freeman and Wszolek our ideal front 4, the only times last season where they played together on the same pitch were:
vs Wigan for 14 minutes
@ PNE for 10 minutes before Freeman got sent off
vs Barnsley for 70 minutes before Wszolek got subbed off for Washington
The other times we generally had someone like Washington or Mackie or Smith in there for at least one of them. We literally managed a full match with added time with our best attacking quartet playing (and most of that time was with Freeman deployed deeper)
If I want to get one thing out of the side this season and us having a mediocre season around it, I'd wanna see more stability in the side. Have a solid team playing regularly together and then we can say that we're looking long term, because then we are building something and seeing the results in the form of an actual team."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by nasser95 View PostNot really, just need a couple of full backs. Everything else is generally pretty in place, with the exception of depth.
The issue is that managers never used their best combination of players together. If we call Yeni, Sylla, Freeman and Wszolek our ideal front 4, the only times last season where they played together on the same pitch were:
vs Wigan for 14 minutes
@ PNE for 10 minutes before Freeman got sent off
vs Barnsley for 70 minutes before Wszolek got subbed off for Washington
The other times we generally had someone like Washington or Mackie or Smith in there for at least one of them. We literally managed a full match with added time with our best attacking quartet playing (and most of that time was with Freeman deployed deeper)
If I want to get one thing out of the side this season and us having a mediocre season around it, I'd wanna see more stability in the side. Have a solid team playing regularly together and then we can say that we're looking long term, because then we are building something and seeing the results in the form of an actual team.
Comment
-
Originally posted by knocker View Postwell as someone who witnessed every minute that Yeni played home and away last season, I have to say that 90% of the time he was absolute dogs poo."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by corbray View Posti like the sound of that and its the sort of thing that should work but sadly i think tarbs is right and smith will play over sylla. dont get me wrong, smith is a good target man but hes too one dimensional, if anything he should be a sub coming on for the last 30 minutes or so to try nick a goal or preserve a lead
Still, it could be worse, he could have them hoof the ball towards Washington and Mackie, as he did with Gallen and Cureton about 12 years ago.Last edited by stanistheman; 17-07-2017, 01:13 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by davieqpr View PostSmith is very good at winning headers but is absolutely useless at directing a header. Hence misses some good chances and very rarely finds a colleague.
Ollie plays him because of his defensive work at corners.
Here's a novel idea, how about signing a defender who can do that instead.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nasser95 View PostAnd as someone who saw the same thing, I can understand that, but it doesn't help when a player is pigeonholed away from his best abilities. He was not played to his strengths and when he finally is, we'll see the consistency we want from him. He is certainly much better than Washington Mackie or Smith
You are correct .
for example, Lineker and Bergkamp were both played out wide at Barcelona and Inter Milan and flopped, however playing in their correct positions, they were not so bad afterall.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stanistheman View PostYou are correct .
for example, Lineker and Bergkamp were both played out wide at Barcelona and Inter Milan and flopped, however playing in their correct positions, they were not so bad afterall."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
Comment