If Hall is match fit he simply has to start IMO.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The XI v Huddersfield? Time for Speed
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hubble View PostOn paper I like that a lot, but like Kev says, not sure Ravel is match fit enough to start. Also feel Goss not fully up to speed yet. It worked having Hall as a DM and I feel we have to respect Hudds, we can't be too open at the back.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LoftusRoadLad View Post----------------------Smithies--------------------
Perch-----------Ned------------Hall-------Bidwell
------------Goss-----------------Manning---------
------------------------Ravel------------------------
Pawel---------------Washington-----------Mackie
Watcha all think ? Or will he stick to the Toons team ?
Comment
-
Good comments all. Great to have options. Agree Ravel should be a sub atm, but one that's used. Love the way Mackie plays, but would definitely platoon him with Lualua when we have two match weeks; too much for one of our older players. Agree that Perch the more solid defender than Furlong, but need to develop latter as a first team player; coin flip here. What's most interesting on this thread is that Luongo is not on anyone's starting lineup sheet.
Comment
Comment