With the three big clubs in London, Arsenal, Spurs and Chelsea, having so many promising young players waiting to play in a first team, how come we are the only club that seems so uninterested to bring some on loan? Fulham, Brentford, Bristol, Rotherham and don't how many more, get good players from these clubs on loan. Why not we? Are we so proud and big headed that we think we do not need any help?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Out of curiosity...
Collapse
X
-
Past two seasons I think we used the loan system well, Angella and Konchesky last season and Isla, Zarate, Krancjar and Vargas year before. JFH was very against loans so seems to be main reason. Pawel is a good player though and he came in on loan.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shania View PostAren`t we trying to retain recreate our own identity?
We just need to start playing good football and winning games and cut the identity, badge, branding ########. The money will come when the pitch works.
Comment
-
Cant believe hubs thinks tom carrol was good, terrible player, see hes not getting in that spurs side any more!
Comment
-
Originally posted by topperharley View PostPedantic, but you can't recreate our own identity.
We just need to start playing good football and winning games and cut the identity, badge, branding ########. The money will come when the pitch works.
I think you are spot on, that´s why we even have to re-sign Clint Hill. We can do with staying up this year..QPR
Best team in the world
Sort of
Comment
Comment