If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Think Sandro situation is deeper than just not being good enough to play, We will soon know next week as I am sure Holloway will pick him if he sees him as an asset.
He would be long gone and playing football if he wanted to matty mate .
It's the big wage that he gets here for doing fark all that's the only thing stopping him.
Thats not quite true ,,, he was subject to a couple of moves in the summer but if i recall one of them fell through due to failing a medical ..
I dont see how anybody can label him a mercenary .. He just wants to play, and for whatever hidden reason that is not happening.
And as a previous poster said 'a brazil international with 20 plus caps' cant even get into a mid to lower championship side - fookin joke
I for one would like to know the truth ,,,, Karl Henry over Sandro - Yeah rite
He hasn't got a contract like Greeno has he? Play's a certain amount of games and automatically gets a new contract!
Just don't understand why he is left in the wilderness
I was told that he gets an appearance fee of like 20k per league game, which is why he plays in the cup and not the league. The source is someone who works at QPR, but I dont really know him so of course, this is only a rumour and I am not claiming it as a fact.
From what I've seen of them this season, at least Cousins leaves the centre circle for anything but a corner. Sandro is so immobile for some reason this season, but people will forget it because he scored from a few corners.
It's almost like you wouldn't want us to improve just to suit your agenda mate. Sandro is head and shoulders our best Central Midfielder and anyone who says anything else is nuts. He's not being played through not being good enough cos he's better than Karl Henry blindfolded. Their are other reasons for his omission, reasons we do not know.
Agreed.
Get him in the team and match fit, he can be the best midfielder at the club.
Got to be contractual..
JFh played nearly every single player in tne squad except the beast, does anyone think he would leave out a player of that experience when his job was on the line.
Told he cant be picked imho. Same as Ollie will be told.
I was told that he gets an appearance fee of like 20k per league game, which is why he plays in the cup and not the league. The source is someone who works at QPR, but I dont really know him so of course, this is only a rumour and I am not claiming it as a fact.
You'll find out when Ollie selects his 1st couple sides if he's a mercenary he'll be outers if he wants to play he'll be in , unless there is a contractual problem
If he doesnt pick him/play him against Norwich are we going to be saying clueless clown dont pick the best player in the division etc, he really ain't got a clue?
You'll find out when Ollie selects his 1st couple sides if he's a mercenary he'll be outers if he wants to play he'll be in , unless there is a contractual problem
I think it's clearly contractual. Nothing else makes any sense, bloke scores 3 oals in 2 cup games and doesn't get a sniff of league action all season. Just wish the club could come to some agreement and get the bloke on the pitch, cos everytime he is, he is aan asset (imo).
The only reason people have a fascination is because it's a player (A Mercenary, might I add) not playing under the regime, and because the club doesn't want to play him, he's flavour of the week.
I like you Nas, but just recently you have been talking like a bloke who has no idea about the subject he is talking about. Be less stubborn and more open to change your opinions where it's clear you are wrong and you will get far more respect on here than you currently do.
I think it's clearly contractual. Nothing else makes any sense, bloke scores 3 oals in 2 cup games and doesn't get a sniff of league action all season. Just wish the club could come to some agreement and get the bloke on the pitch, cos everytime he is, he is aan asset (imo).
Maybe we canīt fix it. Suppose a part of the transfer fee, say 2 million, would only go to Spurs, if he plays 30 QPR league matches? Would you still play him?
He is currently on 28 games, so something like that could be an explanation.
Comment