If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
We actually played a very high line against Fulham... but anything to make a point I guess. Even our midfield pushed up and Henry only dropped back when Caulker or one of the full backs went forward...
Bang on nasser. Was about to point that out myself, and then I read your post. It's hopeless to argue against some of these posters though. Radio commentary went on and on about this. Apparently they were only right about this game when they claimed we were extremely lucky and didn't deserve to win
You really are an annoying, condescending know all.
Totally, I should just accept when something untrue is said
"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Totally, I should just accept when something untrue is said
No just accept that some people have a different opinion than you and they might be correct. Just stop talking down to everyone as though your the font of all knowledge and must be right.
No just accept that some people have a different opinion than you and they might be correct. Just stop talking down to everyone as though your the font of all knowledge and must be right.
Think it is only fair that nass points out to hal, that we actually played a high line in the Fulham game. The point hal makes is based on something which is not true, or at least very debatable. As I posted above, the radio commentary was going on and on about our high line FFS. Just like someone in the Luongo thread claiming Mass was worthless against Newcastle, but guess what he didn´t play in that game. You should be allowed to point out a few facts to posters, who are busy slagging the club off in their own fantasy world, without being called condescending and annoying. What´s really annoying here is people bending over backwards to find fault with everything QPR.
Think it is only fair that nass points out to hal, that we actually played a high line in the Fulham game. The point hal makes is based on something which is not true, or at least very debatable. As I posted above, the radio commentary was going on and on about our high line FFS. Just like someone in the Luongo thread claiming Mass was worthless against Newcastle, but guess what he didn´t play in that game. You should be allowed to point out a few facts to posters, who are busy slagging the club off in their own fantasy world, without being called condescending and annoying. What´s really annoying here is people bending over backwards to find fault with everything QPR.
no one finds fault with everything qpr. Some are not happy with JFH, some not fans of Les as they see the 2 linked. Everyone on here wants the best for qpr and wants them to get to the top just see different ways of getting there. Blimey my last sentence was great, almost poetic.....might have it on my headstone.
No just accept that some people have a different opinion than you and they might be correct. Just stop talking down to everyone as though your the font of all knowledge and must be right.
When have I ever said they can't be right? If i didn't believe my own opinion, I'd be a pretty bad example of a human being ffs. You can create your own image of me where I talk down to everyone and refuse to accept that they have an opinion different to mine, when in fact the truth is that all I do is post longer statements and state a combination of factual statistics and my own opinions and people create this weird impression that I'm a know it all, which I guess comes with the territory. You think whatever you want of me, as long as you're aware that I don't actually care about whether you dislike me or not
"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
no one finds fault with everything qpr. Some are not happy with JFH, some not fans of Les as they see the 2 linked. Everyone on here wants the best for qpr and wants them to get to the top just see different ways of getting there. Blimey my last sentence was great, almost poetic.....might have it on my headstone.
I know, James. And some are not happy, period
"Everyone on here wants the best for qpr": Where can you find that graveyard?
As I posted above, the radio commentary was going on and on about our high line FFS.
What I said is based on what I saw. We were able to transition from defence to attack more effectively and moved up with the ball. But once they had it in our half we dropped off, hence the Scott Parker comments made by a couple of people who saw the same thing.
Naz and I have disagreed but tbf he has never suggested that no one else has the right to do that.......
Comment