If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Dont see charlie moving. HITC website is very hit and miss.. mostly miss. He moved to southampton for a reason. He wants to be down south and I'd only expect him to go anywhere else for CL aspirations. Everton are a little bit away from that.
I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles
I will tell you all something for nothing - we cannot afford Charlie's wages and Southampton are very unlikely going to want to subsidise them for a loan.
I will tell you all something for nothing - we cannot afford Charlie's wages and Southampton are very unlikely going to want to subsidise them for a loan.
This deal might seem more realistic when the transfer window closes and Charlie is still sitting on the bench for Southampton.
I have to say if Charlie wanted to come back on loan I think we would subsidies a a huge percentage of his wage as the board know with the team we have now and a fit Austin then we would have a extremely good chance of automatic promotion.
Never been a fan of going backwards and players comimg back, but would love Chaz here to fire us to the Prem again.
But im really certain this will never ever happen. So many sides still in the premiership who would take him if Soton want to get rid. (Which i aso doubt)
This deal might seem more realistic when the transfer window closes and Charlie is still sitting on the bench for Southampton.
I have to say if Charlie wanted to come back on loan I think we would subsidies a a huge percentage of his wage as the board know with the team we have now and a fit Austin then we would have a extremely good chance of automatic promotion.
Annoyingly the loan window closes at the same time now. No more waiting to see who's unwanted and potentially signing decent players on loan
Newest bowlarks rumour on twitter is Chaz to Newcastle for 12.5 million by Wednesday.
Why is that not true? Newcastle are in profit on the business they've done so far and Sissoko will be off soon for anything north of £25m.
Chaz is behind Long at least. Redmond played up front on Saturday instead of Chaz and they also have Rodriguez. £8.5m profit for 6 months is great business if the manager doesn't really like him or has his eye on a replacement within the £12.5m range.
Comment