Same as watford, but with Petrasso or El Khayat in for Gladwin.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Team for Leeds?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LoftusRoadLad View Posthenry or luongo ? is there much difference ?
Luongo will hopefully create a lot more than Henry? Luongo looked good alongside Cousins against Watford. I know that we will probably meet a much fitter side on Sunday but anyway...I would go for Luongo and Cousins.Last edited by Shania; 03-08-2016, 08:31 PM.QPR
Best team in the world
Sort of
Comment
-
Originally posted by dave58 View PostEveryone got the Chief out of position at RB which he's never been? so if he doesn't warrant his place at CB, then really shouldn't be in the team, play a proper RB, i like the Chief but a good RB he aint
Comment
-
Most important decision is if Ned plays, where you put him. Everything comes from that call imo. I don't think it does him any good playing anywhere but CB, but then we have other options there...... the CB pairing absolutely critical to outcome. Always will be.
A bit surprised everyone considers Sandro surplus to requirements. And all the 3-1 options people have gone for look a little be weak to me. Because we are weak there by default unless..........
Comment
-
Originally posted by hal9thou View PostMost important decision is if Ned plays, where you put him.
Personally think Ned and Hall are an established CB pairing and we should start with that but can see JFH accommodating Caulker and playing Ned at RB.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cjskinz View PostJFH has said he is no where near the starting 11.
Re Ned: no one should be untouchable when it comes to selection. You're good enough or your not. I'd only play him at CB.
Comment
Comment