Gets my goat every time you hear from pundits & SSN about possession, passes made, distance run etc.etc the only statistic that counts is how many times the ball (legally) hits the net!
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Statistics
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Artful View PostGets my goat every time you hear from pundits & SSN about possession, passes made, distance run etc.etc the only statistic that counts is how many times the ball (legally) hits the net!"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
-
Originally posted by Jimmy Floyd Rabbit View PostLike I've said before you could have 99% possession, 30 shots on target, if the other team breaks and scores and you lose 1-0 what good or use are those stats? F%ck all.
Waste of time. Good for when you're buying players, performance wise, but not for matches."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by loftbalcony View PostPlay off Wembley 2014 stats, I rest my case your honour.
It's like people have some difficulty reading here. Here, I'll break it down for you on that match. You're probably looking at the fact that they had 67.1% possession, 16 shots, 83% pass success rate. That's normal for people to look at, but it doesn't tell the story. What I rather look at is the touches per shot (How efficient we were from start to finish). Derby had 43 touches per shot, we only had 39, making us more efficient than them and that's the general tale of the story of the match. we made 3.4 tackles per foul that game, they made 2.5, which means their tackling was worse than ours. When you look at possession, we were significantly more efficient than them, not only did we have a higher proportion of passes than them in the final third compared to our total passes (75% to their 72%), but given that we had made almost half the passes they did, we were more efficient with our passing leading to chance creation. It took them 32 passes to take a shot, it only took us 22.
So you suggest that the stats show that they should have won, well the raw stats do, but for match analysis, raw stats don't tell the full story and a bit of extra work needs to go in, hence the existence of analysts in sport.
Hope I answered your question/statement."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jimmy Floyd Rabbit View PostOne doth protest to much
In any case, as I've said before, just looking at numbers makes for an easy target of bs. at the same time, totally ignoring them hides the full picture. It's all about balance at the end of the day. The numbers are useful but you have to really know what you're looking for."What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
While I think live match stats can sometimes be a bit tedious, I acknowledge that stats can be an important post-match analysis tool which can assist clubs (and fans) in understanding what happened during the match and why, and therefore also help with preparation for coming matches.QPR since 1993
WATRB since 2015
First QPR game hopefully in 2017
Comment
-
It's when SSN use football manager stats. Like xyz player has 12 passing but 15 determination.Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Please Follow My Twitter
Comment
-
Originally posted by loftbalcony View Post1 shot on target and 1 goal. Says all I need to know"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
Comment