Long contracts on huge money for players nearing the end of their careers.....no, that's what we are against. I assume that Conor is nowhere near those salaries we used to give to SWP, Barton, etc......he will not bankrupt the club if things do not work. Its easy to say offer an improved contract. However, if things work out well for him he will not sign an extension....same as CA did. He will look for better proposals....including, playing Premier football. I know I am a bit too concerned, however, as they say, once bitten......!
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Conor's contract.
Collapse
X
-
How do you feel about our decision to give Junior Hoilett a long contract, or Shaun Wright-Phillips, or Julio Cesar? And how about Rowan Vine and Rob Hulse? Great decision to give those guys long contracts too.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't on this one. Give a player a long contract and his career goes backwards then you're left with a player you can't get rid of until the contract is up. Give them too short a contract and they move on too soon or for not enough money like Austin.
Comment
-
I already mentioned that to give long contracts on huge salaries is a non-starter. Our past mistakes were always the same......our owners believed that we can compete with the big clubs by offering money that we did not have. I believe that the likes of Luongo, Cherry, Jet, Hall and now Conor, have signed on much more sensible money. I also believe the club is making shrewd signings, young players that can prosper thus increasing their value. On the other hand, we must ensure that we are not caught napping when a player is showing signs of becoming good. Hall is a good example. In his case, we acted quickly and did not leave discussions for the last 18 months or so to improve his contract. I also believe that Conor will be a hit.....that's why I am a bit concerned.Last edited by Martinmalta; 20-01-2016, 08:05 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostEvil Les probably pocketed a bigger drink from washingtons agent by only doing three and half years. It's the only feasible explanation.
He happened to over hear a conversation between a well known Journo and an ex pro where they said Sir Les was up to his evil best in that the only reason he sanctioned Conor was because Sir Les went to Washington DC circa 1986 and fell in love with watching the Washington Redskins and from then on hatched a devilish plan to recruit a player solely to remind him of his holiday.......
30 years later... his dastardly plan came to fruition
Matters are made worse as on that same trip Sir Les had a bad experience in Austin Texas
I'm gonna write to Tony to tell him Eviles must be stopped, it's not like he's done anything for our club.
Comment
Comment