If we had started with two strikers....

[MYU]

Would we be so upset with the result today, it's just a question?

[1973 ranger]

We do not have 2 strikers at the club.

[MYU]

Polter & JET?

[1973 ranger]

Is jet a striker or a wide man?

[MYU]

Is jet a striker or a wide man?

I thought he was a striker?

[1973 ranger]

I only ask as other than when Chaz was out injured earliee in the season he has played wide.

[Kevin Mcleod]

Scores like one when he plays for us.

[Alanwycombe]

We don't create anything for strikers to work with.

[1973 ranger]

You would have thought with all the dough spunked we would have a back up for Austin.

[Jimmy Floyd Rabbit]

4-4-2 at home. Forget the silly talk about its 'out of fashion' seems to be working ok for Leicester!!

Phillips & Hoilett wide. JET & Polter up front. That's 4 attacking players. There is a goal in that set up.

No. Let's play 5 midfielders & a winger up front who can't score 1 on 1 from 7 yards.

Schoolboy stuff

[Qprtanpa1]

4-4-2 at home. Forget the silly talk about its 'out of fashion' seems to be working ok for Leicester!!

Phillips & Hoilett wide. JET & Polter up front. That's 4 attacking players. There is a goal in that set up.

No. Let's play 5 midfielders & a winger up front who can't score 1 on 1 from 7 yards.

Schoolboy stuff

Totally agree. Could also add Chery in for spice. But this stubborn insistence on playing players out of position has got to stop; doesn't take a half or full season as a manager to get that. Fer is finished; stop the Dutch loyalty and start showing loyalty to QPR's need to field a competitive team.

Schoolboy stuff[/QUOTE]