Difference with holiet is that he was one of best young players in the prem when we signed him. Traore on the other hand....
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hoilett
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostCouple of good games on the trot after about forty rubbish ones, and he's getting so much praise. I'm glad he's played well the last few games but he's not worth any major praise yet. Two goals in forty games shows how poor he's been. But saying that, how many of our superstar wage players have done well, apart from chaz. It's just the norm at the bush.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostStill reckon you should score more than two in forty as a front man. He's been a failure after showing so much early promise and the reason why we bought him imho.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostStill reckon you should score more than two in forty as a front man. He's been a failure after showing so much early promise and the reason why we bought him imho.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by maidstone_hoop View Postgenuinely don't think much of the bloke as a footballer and I must of slagged him off as much as anyone on here.
However think it's only fair to post something positive when deserved and his application the last few games has been much improved and to see a end product today and nearly a second goal I can only say I hope it continues.
Still have my doubts but I love it when someone turns it around!
Just to play devils advocate anyone feel his form coincides with the fact he will be after a new contract in 5 months time?!?
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostStill reckon you should score more than two in forty as a front man. He's been a failure after showing so much early promise and the reason why we bought him imho.
if you class him as a faliure then what would you class bobby z?nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
Comment
Comment