I all the personal attacks on Chris Ramsey that I read on here extremely distasteful. Let's differentiate between Chris Ramsey the man and Chris Ramsey the manager.
As far as I can tell, Ramsey is a decent bloke. His heart's in the right place, and of course, he is trying his best to succeed. But Chris Ramsey the manager clearly just isn't up to the job of managing a team in the cauldron of the Championship. But surely the blame has to lie with whoever appointed him? Rather than coating the man off continuously, we should look to our chairman, who couldn't make the right decision if it smacked him in the face. Hapless doesn't come close. Every single decision Tony Fernandes has made since becoming chairman has been backwards. Sacking Colin, appointing Hughes (with free rein to spend), sacking him too late, appointing Redknapp with a similar open cheque-book, being utterly in thrall to him, sacking him too late, and then, appointing a man who has never managed before as first team coach, on a three year contract.
It's bewildering. I mean, how has he actually managed to run a successful business? Maybe football is Tony Fernandes' kryptonite.
It occurs to me the same thing applies to Nedum Onuoha. How many people on here, who were lauding him and calling him Chief and saying what a great captain he'd make are now saying he's a total donkey? Onuoha is being played out of position. He's clearly not a right back. He, like Ramsey, is trying his best. Nedum is a better than average centre-back, but he's been playing in a defence that our manager (who is, managerially, clueless) continually chops and changes. Not easy for him, trying to step into the role of captain at the same time.
Ramsey needs to go, I think we're all (well, 99% of us) agreed on that. But let's try and refrain from making it personal. The real problem at our club is Fernandes. He's learning how to be a chairman on the job, just like Ramsey is learning how to be a manager, at the expense of long-suffering fans who have supported the club through thick and thin. I'm not sure what we can do about this. The one bright light in the gloom might be Lee Hoos, who I've met twice now, and seems to know what's what. Let's hope he can have some kind of influence on this shambles. He may prove to be Fernandes' first good decision.
As far as I can tell, Ramsey is a decent bloke. His heart's in the right place, and of course, he is trying his best to succeed. But Chris Ramsey the manager clearly just isn't up to the job of managing a team in the cauldron of the Championship. But surely the blame has to lie with whoever appointed him? Rather than coating the man off continuously, we should look to our chairman, who couldn't make the right decision if it smacked him in the face. Hapless doesn't come close. Every single decision Tony Fernandes has made since becoming chairman has been backwards. Sacking Colin, appointing Hughes (with free rein to spend), sacking him too late, appointing Redknapp with a similar open cheque-book, being utterly in thrall to him, sacking him too late, and then, appointing a man who has never managed before as first team coach, on a three year contract.
It's bewildering. I mean, how has he actually managed to run a successful business? Maybe football is Tony Fernandes' kryptonite.
It occurs to me the same thing applies to Nedum Onuoha. How many people on here, who were lauding him and calling him Chief and saying what a great captain he'd make are now saying he's a total donkey? Onuoha is being played out of position. He's clearly not a right back. He, like Ramsey, is trying his best. Nedum is a better than average centre-back, but he's been playing in a defence that our manager (who is, managerially, clueless) continually chops and changes. Not easy for him, trying to step into the role of captain at the same time.
Ramsey needs to go, I think we're all (well, 99% of us) agreed on that. But let's try and refrain from making it personal. The real problem at our club is Fernandes. He's learning how to be a chairman on the job, just like Ramsey is learning how to be a manager, at the expense of long-suffering fans who have supported the club through thick and thin. I'm not sure what we can do about this. The one bright light in the gloom might be Lee Hoos, who I've met twice now, and seems to know what's what. Let's hope he can have some kind of influence on this shambles. He may prove to be Fernandes' first good decision.
Comment