Should Mackie, when healthy, and who remains a speedy, gritty, all-in player, be re-considered as a backup to Perch as well as a first-in-off-the-bench midfielder?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
When Mackie Returns...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ramsey is god View PostPlease not this debate again!!!!!!
JAMIE MACKIE IS NOT A RIGHT BACK......ONE DECENT PERFORMANCE 4 YEARS AGO AT RIGHT BACK DOES NOT MEAN HE WILL BE GOOD THERE.
Ramsey might as well go ask for his P45 if he does that imho
Comment
-
I'd sooner recall Harriman or Furlong than play Mackie there. Mackie should be up front.Top Scorers 2018/2019
Nakhi Wells - 8
Pawel Wszolek - 6
Luke Freeman - 6
Matt Smith - 6
Ebere Eze - 4
Joel Lynch - 3
Tomer Hemed - 3
Toni Leistner - 2
Massimo Luongo- 2
Angel Rangel - 2
Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
Geoff Cameron - 1
Aramide Oteh - 1
Jake Bidwell - 1
Jordan Cousins - 1
Summer Transfers 2019
IN
OUT
Comment
-
When Mackie returns
ALL WILL BE WELL AGAIN.Banning people is no longer my hobby,
but take a look at my photo blog:
http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/
How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852
Comment
-
Originally posted by vespa View Postid give him the managers job"Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
For us that would mean around 29k."
QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pm
Comment
Comment