Scenario;
Rangers win a few games and seem to be on the up, nothing will change management wise, we'll just say Warnock coming in has helped Ramsey.
Rangers lose a few of our next games, and we'll be saying, Warnock is past it and it hasn't worked, so why would we then put him in sole charge? Makes no sense.
The appointment of Chris Ramsey hasn't worked out, absolutely nothing wrong with that. Everyone tried to make it work, problem is QPR hierarchy should of recognized that & installed Warnock as manager straight out. I just can't see how he can be the manager if we win OR lose.
Shame as we needed a fresh start & Neil's experience to get us back on track.
Rangers win a few games and seem to be on the up, nothing will change management wise, we'll just say Warnock coming in has helped Ramsey.
Rangers lose a few of our next games, and we'll be saying, Warnock is past it and it hasn't worked, so why would we then put him in sole charge? Makes no sense.
The appointment of Chris Ramsey hasn't worked out, absolutely nothing wrong with that. Everyone tried to make it work, problem is QPR hierarchy should of recognized that & installed Warnock as manager straight out. I just can't see how he can be the manager if we win OR lose.
Shame as we needed a fresh start & Neil's experience to get us back on track.
Comment