Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Angella debut

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
    Westy suggested 3 at the back, so we could get 2 up front, could that be the answer to the cb conundrum?
    4231 works fine so long as the 1 gets enough support from the 3. which is what we've been doing well up until yesterday. So no need to change the formation yet IMO. What bûggered it up was the sending off

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Stanley View Post
      Ned is decent but just not as good as Hall and Angella IMO. He's strong quick and good in the air and in the tackle but his distribution is what lets him down at times. Think the other two would make a better paring
      I do absolutely agree. It seems like Angella is a bit more vocal aswell. I have never seen Hall before, but he was surpringly good.
      QPR
      Best team in the world
      Sort of

      Comment

      Working...
      X