Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Playing Style?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by AndoverRanger View Post
    Charlie Austin needs a big man up front to help him which is why we should be paying two up top!
    I disagree.

    What Charlie Austin needs is too good traditional wingers who know how to whip balls into dangerous areas for him to get on the end of.

    That's his strength and what he's always thrived on throughout his career.

    That's how he always scored most of his goals pre-QPR.

    Kevin Gallen said exactly the same.

    Aint rocket science. Feed him correctly and he scores goals.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Stanley View Post
      I disagree.

      What Charlie Austin needs is too good traditional wingers who know how to whip balls into dangerous areas for him to get on the end of.

      That's his strength and what he's always thrived on throughout his career.

      That's how he always scored most of his goals pre-QPR.

      Kevin Gallen said exactly the same.

      Aint rocket science. Feed him correctly and he scores goals.
      Sort of agree Stan but without a target man type player to allow the team to move up the pitch by holding it up or flicking it on then we would struggle to feed the ball to the traditional wingers in the right areas of the pitch. Unless we try to build slowly from the back but we seem to struggle with that also

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Toninho View Post
        Not sure what game you were watching?

        38% possession vs 62% at home!



        I would be disappointed with these stats even if we were playing Man Utd at home let alone Cardiff.

        We made them look like Barcelona
        this and the defence are real issues and have not improved since last season and if it carries on then CR is the man that gets paid to be responsible !

        Comment

        Working...
        X