Terrible debut....end of
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Perch
Collapse
X
-
Poor but I think overall he will be a decnt signing. Koncheski on the other hand? Short termism at its worst.
For all our new era, new philosophy bs we had a 3 35+ year olds in the back 5 with experience in perch and Onuoha alongside and another 30+ in Karl Henry just infront. Brave new world my ###.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ramsgate Hoop View PostI thought he started well. Then he let that pass from Green go under his foot second half and he went to pieces
Comment
-
Originally posted by Del View PostKoncheski has been #### for years. The only signing I see no logic in at all.
Apart from lugano. We signed a whole heap of dross.nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hitman34 View PostSaid this about both fullbacks when we signed them. Both rubbish. Got shot down on here for it.
Apart from lugano. We signed a whole heap of dross.
Comment
-
If we are able to escape with a much smaller FFP penalty, and get close to $15m for Charlie, we'll have enough to truly invest in another defender or two plus a striker. That could change a lot of things, especially on defense, where IMO we should throw a lot of people into the mix and see who excels. By the way, believe Furlong has been undeservedly dismissed here.
Comment
-
Attack is our problem. Not defence. One large untested German unit. And that's it!!!!! We could easily have won yesterday had we eleven players on the pitch and played a striker (Charlie didn't turn up). We need two strikers and a CB. We can make do with Perch and Konchesky.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rangers77 View PostAttack is our problem. Not defence. One large untested German unit. And that's it!!!!! We could easily have won yesterday had we eleven players on the pitch and played a striker (Charlie didn't turn up). We need two strikers and a CB. We can make do with Perch and Konchesky.
Comment
Comment