Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cagliari icon Francesco Pisano could join R's

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    On
    Originally posted by klonk View Post
    not sure... wages are nowhere near as high in serie a as you might imagine. one of the problems shifting fattie taarabt to italy was that, to match what we were paying him, he would have been the 4th highest paid player in the whole of the italian league. according to the graphic below, which so far as i can work out, shows the annual salary (ingaggio) in millions of euro for every player in serie a, he was on €450k a year last season, so about £6k a week.

    Interesting reading thanks for posting it up, Napoli and Roma appear surprise high payers to me, on whole wages much more sensible than here with our £35k p/w to Luke Young.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Del View Post
      Felt compelled to reply is more to the point.

      The fact is, you completely misinterpreted my various comments, added your own theories and then tried to slate me for your interpretation. It's laughable. The fact you then try to tell me I've missed the point just compounds it.

      I won't be saying another word on the subject, because if you try to spin things any more its clearly a complete waste of time.
      What's laughable is how I made exactly the same (valid) points as Stan, yet I'm somehow adding theories and misinterpreting your comments. Strange.
      Last edited by surrey_hoop; 27-07-2015, 10:12 AM.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by surrey_hoop View Post
        What's laughable is how I made exactly the same (valid) points as Stan, yet I'm somehow adding theories and misinterpreting your comments. Strange.
        Perhaps it's because I tried to make the same points in a slightly less abrasive manner, Surrey.

        Comment


        • #49
          Deepcut in surrey init

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Stanley View Post
            Perhaps it's because I tried to make the same points in a slightly less abrasive manner, Surrey.
            Does that make mine any less valid then?

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
              Deepcut in surrey init

              Good one?
              Last edited by surrey_hoop; 27-07-2015, 02:42 PM.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by surrey_hoop View Post
                Does that make mine any less valid then?
                No. But it's likely to elicit a proportionally abrasive response. Basic human nature.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Has this been added to the slug it out section Stan?

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Stanley View Post
                    No. But it's likely to elicit a proportionally abrasive response. Basic human nature.
                    Well that was the point I was making, and he was arguing with. Glad we've cleared that up.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Hove Ranger View Post
                      Has this been added to the slug it out section Stan?
                      Not just yet Hove.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by surrey_hoop View Post
                        Good one?
                        bad one?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by QPRDave View Post
                          bad one?
                          I'm not sure I can say either way, seeing as I have absolutely no idea what it meant.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X